2011
DOI: 10.1016/s2173-5077(11)70021-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Implementation of a perioperative multimodal rehabilitation protocol in elective colorectal surgery. A prospective randomised controlled study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
38
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(39 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
1
38
0
Order By: Relevance
“…That observation partly explains why the cost saving attributable to eras implementation was higher for the non-cancer patients than for the cancer patients in the present study. In addition, colon cancer patients are typically more likely to require open surgeries, as noted in our study and reported in randomized controlled trials [20][21][22][23] , translating into longer los and therefore a lower cost saving. A fuller economic evaluation, evaluating the economic impact of eras both on the colorectal experience and on other surgery types (as the approach is scaled) is forthcoming.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 63%
“…That observation partly explains why the cost saving attributable to eras implementation was higher for the non-cancer patients than for the cancer patients in the present study. In addition, colon cancer patients are typically more likely to require open surgeries, as noted in our study and reported in randomized controlled trials [20][21][22][23] , translating into longer los and therefore a lower cost saving. A fuller economic evaluation, evaluating the economic impact of eras both on the colorectal experience and on other surgery types (as the approach is scaled) is forthcoming.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 63%
“…The mean age of the included patients was between 16 and 94 years (5,8), except one of them (16) that had a small group of children of 10 years, whom were not considered in this revision and only adults were included in the review. Men were more predominant within 18 (66.6%) of the studies (10)(11)(12)(13)(14)(17)(18)(19)(20)22,23,(25)(26)(27)(28)(29)(30)(31) and there was no mention about sex proportion in 2 (7.4%) works (6,8). Most of the studies proposed 2 groups, the intervention group (fast-track, G-FT) and the control group (traditional, G-T), only in 2 works 4 groups were designed (22,28) (Table I).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The assessment of the nutritional status was performed in 13 (48.1%) studies (8,9,(11)(12)(13)(14)18,21,22,26,(28)(29)(30) generally in the preoperative stage, body mass index (BMI) was used in 7 (53.8%) occasions (8,9,11,12,14,18,26) data was reported mostly by medians and interquartile range being the G-FT groups between 17 and 38.8 kg/m 2 and the G-T groups between 17 and 56.8 kg/ m 2 . Only one author (11.1%) used the subjective global assessment (SGA) (21) of patients nutritional status with which he found a higher number of moderately malnourished in G-FT (47.0%) versus a (7%) in G-T, in both groups was observed (7.0%) of severe malnourished.…”
Section: Patient's Nutritional Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations