Implementation of a physician assistant/hospitalist service in an academic medical center: Impact on efficiency and patient outcomes

Abstract

BACKGROUND:Accreditation Council on Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) duty hour restrictions have led to the widespread implementation of non–house staff services in academic medical centers, yet little is known about the quality and efficiency of patient care on such services.OBJECTIVE:To evaluate the quality and efficiency of patient care on a physician assistant/hospitalist service compared with that of traditional house staff services.DESIGN:Retrospective cohort study.SETTING:Inpatient general medicine service of a 747‐bed academic medical center.PATIENTS:A total of 5194 consecutive patients admitted to the general medical service from July 2005 to June 2006, including 992 patients on the physician assistant/hospitalist service and 4202 patients on a traditional house staff service.INTERVENTION:A geographically localized service staffed with physician assistants and supervised by hospitalists.MEASUREMENTS:Length of stay (LOS), cost of care, inpatient mortality, intensive care unit (ICU) transfers, readmissions, and patient satisfaction.RESULTS:Patients admitted to the study service were younger, had lower comorbidity scores, and were more likely to be admitted at night. After adjustment for these and other factors, and for clustering by attending physician, total cost of care was marginally lower on the study service (adjusted costs 3.9% lower; 95% confidence interval [CI] −7.5% to −0.3%), but LOS was not significantly different (adjusted LOS 5.0% higher; 95% CI, −0.4% to +10%) as compared with house staff services. No difference was seen in inpatient mortality, ICU transfers, readmissions, or patient satisfaction.CONCLUSIONS:For general medicine inpatients admitted to an academic medical center, a service staffed by hospitalists and physician assistants can provide a safe alternative to house staff services, with comparable efficiency. Journal of Hospital Medicine 2008;3:361–368. © 2008 Society of Hospital Medicine.

Effects of a Focused Patient-Centered Care Curriculum on the Experiences of Internal Medicine Residents and their Patients

“…Patients admitted with a principal diagnosis of congestive heart failure to our intervention team had a significantly lower 30-day readmission compared to patients with the same diagnosis on standard housestaff teams. 4 Whereas some studies have found that hospitalist and traditional housestaff services have similar efficiency and costs of care, 18 others have found that hospitalist care is associated with lower costs, especially as hospitalists gain experience on the job. 19 These cost offsets may facilitate implementation and sustainability, even without philanthropic support.…”

Application of Integrated Medical Care Model (Hospitalist) in Emergency Department and its Efficiency and Outcome: 4 years' Experience in Taiwan

“…At present hospitalists on staffs reach 50,000 physicians, more than cardiologists, in almost all medical centers in US [9][10][11][12]. The advantages of HOS include a more rapid, effective and precise dealing with problems no matter in diagnoses, prescription of medications, therapeutic strategies or the communications with patients by sharing decision making with attending physicians rather than by residency in advance [13,14]. Several studies have reported that HOS model at wards provides shorter length of stay and improves quality of care [11,[14][15][16].…”

Workforce Resources for Health in Developing Countries

“…68 MLWs have also been shown to provide safe and effective abortion and anaesthetic services. [69][70][71] There a re data to indicate that MLWs are an effi cient as well as effective investment. Surgery by MLWs in Mozambique produced the same outcome as doctors whose training cost ten times that of the técnicos de cirugía.…”