2017
DOI: 10.1186/s12889-017-4931-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Implementation of a workplace intervention using financial rewards to promote adherence to physical activity guidelines: a feasibility study

Abstract: BackgroundWe designed and implemented the Brigham and Women’s Wellness Initiative (B-Well), a single-arm study to examine the feasibility of a workplace program that used individual and team-based financial incentives to increase physical activity among sedentary hospital employees.MethodsWe enrolled sedentary, non-clinician employees of a tertiary medical center who self-reported low physical activity. Eligible participants formed or joined teams of three members and wore Fitbit Flex activity monitors for two… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
42
0
2

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(46 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
2
42
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…All of these were in the 6-week group. The MVPA results are similar to the workplace study by Losina et al [6] where the average improvement was 31 minutes. Those with better compliance with the Fitbit had substantially higher increases in physical activity.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…All of these were in the 6-week group. The MVPA results are similar to the workplace study by Losina et al [6] where the average improvement was 31 minutes. Those with better compliance with the Fitbit had substantially higher increases in physical activity.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…Fitbit's relatively low cost ($100.00-150.00), compared to research accelerometers [Actigraph, activ PAL] [2] make them attractive for community and workplace health promotion programs. Increased physical activity has been seen in college students [3], women at risk for breast cancer [4], postmenopausal women [5] and sedentary hospital employees [6] when Fitbits were part or all of a long-term intervention (16-24 weeks).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As a result, they live for fewer years than any other racial/ethnic group and live for more years with chronic health problems. 11 While workplace wellness programs are generally effective in improving physical activity, nutrition, reducing body weight, and reducing healthcare costs, [12][13][14][15][16][17][18] , heterogeneity in specific outcomes may be related not only to differences in the interventions (e.g., nutrition, physical activity, or both) and outcomes measured (e.g., weight loss, adherence to nutrition guidelines, physical activity), but also to individual differences in the people participating in these programs. Due to the black/white differences in overall physical activity 9 , one may posit that uptake in physical activity resulting from workplace wellness interventions may also differ between black and white employees.…”
Section: Purposementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, variability in the design of workplace wellness programs may lead to the variability in specific outcomes. For example, financial incentive models have been shown to be effective for improving physical activity, 16,19,20 but these effects seem to differ for individual versus team-based interventions with team-based interventions proving more effective than individual interventions. 19,21,22 However, it remains unclear how team formation (i.e., choosing your teammates or being assigned a team) impacts the effects of workplace wellness programs aimed to improve physical activity.…”
Section: Purposementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Eine Software mit der Aufforderung, eine aktive Pause zu machen, hatte hier keinen Erfolg. Ein Quasiexperiment von Monsey et al [32] [38] dagegen konnte mit finanziellen Anreizen eine leicht erhöhte Adhärenzrate von 58 % erreichen. Stein et al [37] boten in ihrer Untersuchung nicht nur finanzielle Anreize, sondern arbeiteten ebenfalls mit erhöhten Kosten für die Teilnehmer, sollten sich die Werte des Gesundheitsscreenings verschlechtern.…”
Section: Pausenprogrammeunclassified