2008
DOI: 10.1080/14719030801928573
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Implementation of accounting reforms

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
4
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 54 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…More generally, even though literature has long discussed the applicability of private-sector accounting practices in the public sector, with valid motivations both in supporting this concept (the so-called sector neutrality: Anthony, 1983;Anthony, 2000; see also Barton, 2011, pp. 422-423) and contradicting it (Broadbent, Jacobs, & Laughlin, 2001;Broadbent & Laughlin, 1998;Carlin, 2006;Carlin & Guthrie, 2003;Ezzamel, Robson, Stapleton, & McLean, 2007;Lapsley, 1999;Nasi & Steccolini, 2008;Olson, Humphrey, & Guthrie, 1998;ter Bogt & van Helden, 2000), in the specific case of CFS some problems can arise, concerning both the consolidation theory and approaches to be used in defining the consolidation area. These theories and approaches, in turn, refer to the decision-making or accountability reasons, requiring a clarification concerning the goals of the CFS in the public sector.…”
Section: Consolidation Theories and Approachesmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…More generally, even though literature has long discussed the applicability of private-sector accounting practices in the public sector, with valid motivations both in supporting this concept (the so-called sector neutrality: Anthony, 1983;Anthony, 2000; see also Barton, 2011, pp. 422-423) and contradicting it (Broadbent, Jacobs, & Laughlin, 2001;Broadbent & Laughlin, 1998;Carlin, 2006;Carlin & Guthrie, 2003;Ezzamel, Robson, Stapleton, & McLean, 2007;Lapsley, 1999;Nasi & Steccolini, 2008;Olson, Humphrey, & Guthrie, 1998;ter Bogt & van Helden, 2000), in the specific case of CFS some problems can arise, concerning both the consolidation theory and approaches to be used in defining the consolidation area. These theories and approaches, in turn, refer to the decision-making or accountability reasons, requiring a clarification concerning the goals of the CFS in the public sector.…”
Section: Consolidation Theories and Approachesmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…The cash accounting system, which established the managerial culture of public administrations, is essentially based on a process of allocating financial resources according to an economic rationality criterion that guides the assumption of the political-managerial choices. For the main aspects, this system is suitable for the nature and purposes of the local authority, which are characterized by the accounting management of the traditional income and expenditure phases [77][78][79]. The results of the accrual accounting would constitute an enrichment of the cash accounting system by analyzing the essence of the phenomena in their temporal economic interdependencies.…”
Section: The Evolution Of the Italian Local Authorities Accounting Symentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Traditional government accounting, focused on the budget and mainly aimed at ensuring compliance with legal requirements, has proved inadequate in addressing the new challenges of public governance. In consequence, important reforms have been implemented in various countries (Caba and Lo´pez, 2007;Nasi and Steccolini, 2008), in order to develop a public accounting system that is more informative and useful for decision making and accountability (Lu¨der, 1992).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%