2018
DOI: 10.1002/cae.22024
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Implementation of comparative visualization pedagogy for structural dynamics

Abstract: CALSIDOF, a self‐learning tool based on juxtaposition comparative visualization pedagogy is developed and implemented for structural dynamics. The assessment of the effectiveness of the tool was carried out using a questionnaire survey. This survey indicates that the comparative visualization pedagogy approach of CALSIDOF can help in understanding and excite the interest in the subject.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Part of these programs are specialized in earthquake engineering [4]- [11] and are often intended to serve as Journal of Software Engineering and Applications virtual laboratories. Many of them are restricted to simple predefined models, such as single degree-of-freedom (SDOF) and multiple degrees-of-freedom (MDOF) systems [4] [5] [6] [11] [12] [13] [14] [15], or frames defined by parametric templates [7] [8] [9] [10]. Among those that allow free modelling of frames, some rely on non-graphical inputs [16] [17] [18] [19] [20] and only a few have an interactive interface for efficient pre-and post-processing [21] [22]…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Part of these programs are specialized in earthquake engineering [4]- [11] and are often intended to serve as Journal of Software Engineering and Applications virtual laboratories. Many of them are restricted to simple predefined models, such as single degree-of-freedom (SDOF) and multiple degrees-of-freedom (MDOF) systems [4] [5] [6] [11] [12] [13] [14] [15], or frames defined by parametric templates [7] [8] [9] [10]. Among those that allow free modelling of frames, some rely on non-graphical inputs [16] [17] [18] [19] [20] and only a few have an interactive interface for efficient pre-and post-processing [21] [22]…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The analysis of the literature shows the interest to develop more innovative and efficient teaching methodologies that ease students into understanding structural concepts (such as the dynamic behavior of structures) that are hardly perceived from just the mathematical formulations [23]. For example, many authors (such as those of [24][25][26][27]) have proposed practical activities to monitor the dynamic response of small-scale models on educational shaking tables using low-cost sensors. In fact, experiences learned in this work have proven the learning benefits of including a small-scale model analysis when teaching the dynamic response of structures.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%