“…A third analysis including studies that were carried out with protocols that contained retests after the first measurement, comprising 13 studies (21,24,27,28,31,32,34,35,37,38,42,44,45) and a sample of 124,469 participants was also developed (Figures S3 and S4). In this analysis, there was a similar increase in sensitivity to 91% (95% CI: 85% to 95%) and specificity to 100% (95% CI: 100% to 100%).…”