Implementation of e-cigarette regulation through the EU Tobacco Products Directive ( 2016 ) in Wales, Scotland and England from the perspectives of stakeholders involved in policy introduction and enforcement

Abstract

INTRODUCTION From May 2016, the European Union introduced the Tobacco Products Directive (TPD) regulations, which included restrictions to advertising and new safety and labeling standards for e-cigarette products. This represented the first supranational policy regulating e-cigarette sales and marketing. This study explores perceptions of TPD and its implementation in Wales, Scotland and England, from perspectives of stakeholders involved in tobacco and e-cigarette policy and implementation in each nation. METHODS Semi-structured qualitative interviews were completed with 12 stakeholders from government and third sector organizations in the UK involved in tobacco control policy-making processes, and Trading Standards Officers from 13 UK local authorities. Data were analyzed thematically and a sub-sample double-coded. RESULTS Stakeholders held varying views of e-cigarettes, recognizing potential benefits and harms of both the products and the new policy actions. Nevertheless, most perceived TPD to be a positive step in introducing regulation for e-cigarettes. Compliance was perceived as high across nations, although stakeholders highlighted product adaptations to circumvent restrictions, and absence of controls on non-nicotine products. Budgetary and staffing limitations also meant that capacity to communicate new measures, and enforce change, was limited. This led to a gap occupied by industry representatives, who played a substantial role in preparing retailers for adoption of new measures. CONCLUSIONS TPD policy roll-out was largely perceived positively and as having been effectively implemented. However, contribution of industry to communication of new measures and absence of resourcing for effective communication perhaps introduced widespread innovations within regulations. While largely viewed positively, some refinements to device regulations were proposed.

Strategies to tackle non-communicable diseases in Afghanistan: A scoping review

“…Ban on all tobacco advertisements or restriction on tobacco point of sale is the demand reduction measures applied in many countries (32,36,(43)(44)(45)(46). Canada passed the Smoke-Free Ontario Act (SFOA) in 2006 by which restrictions were applied on tobacco point of sale in any place.…”

Impacts of EU Tobacco Products Directive regulations on use of e-cigarettes in adolescents in Great Britain: a natural experiment evaluation

“…Policy stakeholder interviews included 12 individuals in England, Scotland and Wales whose professional roles included a significant emphasis on tobacco control policy. 106 Stakeholders included four interviewees within government roles, three interviewees with roles such as tobacco control within government agencies and five policy advocates within the voluntary sector. Trading standards representatives were interviewed from 13 local authority areas in England, Scotland and Wales.…”

Smoke-free spaces: a decade of progress, a need for more?

“…Measurement of SHA is complex and the methods used to quantify bystander exposure are currently poorly developed 23. Policies on e-cigarette use are much more fragmented reflecting the tobacco control community’s mixed views on the benefits of using e-cigarettes to tackle the tobacco epidemic versus the potential harms of a new generation of nicotine users, dual use and the impact of SHA exposure 24 25…”