Implementation of graphic health warning labels on tobacco products in India: the interplay between the cigarette and the bidi industries

Abstract

Objectives To understand the competition between and among tobacco companies and health groups that led to graphical health warning labels (GHWL) on all tobacco products in India. Methods Analysis of internal tobacco industry documents in the Legacy Tobacco Document Library, documents obtained through Indias Right to Information ‘ Act, and news reports. Results Implementation of GHWLs in India reflects a complex interplay between the government and the cigarette and bidi industries, who have shared as well as conflicting interests. Joint lobbying by national-level tobacco companies (that are foreign subsidiaries of multinationals) and local producers of other forms of tobacco blocked GHWLs for decades and delayed the implementation of effective GHWLs after they were mandated in 2007. Tobacco control activists used public interest lawsuits and the Right to Information Act to win government implementation of GHWLs on cigarette, bidi and smokeless tobacco packs in May 2009 and rotating GHWLs in December 2011. Conclusions GHWLs in India illustrate how the presence of bidis and cigarettes in the same market creates a complex regulatory environment. The government imposing tobacco control on multinational cigarette companies led to the enforcement of regulation on local forms of tobacco. As other developing countries with high rates of alternate forms of tobacco use establish and enforce GHWL laws, the tobacco control advocacy community can use pressure on the multinational cigarette industry as an indirect tool to force implementation of regulations on other forms of tobacco.

Perceived effectiveness of text and pictorial health warnings for smokeless tobacco packages in Navi Mumbai, India, and Dhaka, Bangladesh: findings from an experimental study

“…After criticism from the public health community, the Indian Ministry of Health announced a subsequent set of warnings, this time with graphic images of oral cancer. Owing to industry interference, implementation was delayed and warnings did not appear on packages until May 2011 22 23. In Bangladesh, health warnings are not required for smokeless tobacco packaging.…”

Improving the implementation of tobacco control policies in low-and middle-income countries: a proposed framework

“…Implementation is likely to be even more difficult if these companies are cohesive and able to influence government officials and key decision makers. In India, for example, multinational tobacco companies, local bidi producers and smokeless tobacco companies joined forces to successfully delay the implementation of graphic health warning labels in 2007 27. It is important to note that countries like China and Japan face a unique set of challenges given that the tobacco companies are state-owned and curbing tobacco use can threaten government income.…”

Tobacco imagery in on-demand streaming content popular among adolescents and young adults in India: implications for global tobacco control

“…This self-regulatory voluntary code aims to stop the online platforms from showing content that is banned by Indian courts, or promotes terrorism, violence or shows children and women in sexual acts 37. However, earlier evidence suggests that voluntary arrangements are not successful in regulating exposure to tobacco use 38 39. Consequently, our findings suggest that there is an urgent need to devise strong regulatory and enforcement measures related to the depiction of tobacco imagery on on-demand streaming platforms in the interest of public health.…”