Implementation of international good clinical practice guidelines to improve care of patients with cancer-related venous thromboembolism

Qari, Rahaf; Frère, Corinne; Farge, Dominique; Ayoubi, Hanadi El

doi:10.4103/joah.joah_32_17

Cited by 1 publication

(1 citation statement)

References 1 publication

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…As increased in use of IVC filter, complications associated with filter use, such as failure to retrieve the filters when the indication for their use has passed, have also increased [5][6][7]. The main reasons IVC filter retrieval fails are: (i) the filter hook is embedded in the IVC wall due to filter tilting, and (ii) the filter limbs penetrate adjacent organs.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Over-the-wire deployment techniques of option elite inferior vena cava filter: 3D printing vena cava phantom study

Park

Seo

Lee

et al. 2020

European Journal of Radiology Open

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

To compare filter tilt and filter jumping during Option inferior vena cava (IVC) filter deployment with 3 different wires techniques using a 3-dimensional (3D) printing vena cava phantom. Materials and methods: An IVC 3D printed vena cava phantom was made from a healthy young male's computed tomographic data. Option IVC filters were deployed with 3 different wires: i) original push wire, ii) hydrophilic stiff wire, and iii) bent stiff wire. Right internal jugular and right femoral access were used 5 times with each wire. Filter tilt angle, tilt ratio, jumping, and tip abutment to the IVC wall were analyzed. Results: The transfemoral approach with original push wire had significantly higher tilt angle than did the transjugular approach (6.1˚± 1.9 vs. 3.5˚± 1.3, p = 0.04). Mean tilt ratio was significantly lower with the bent wire with transfemoral access (0.49 ± 0.13 vs. 0.78 ± 0.18 [original push-wire] and 0.67 ± 0.08 [stiff wire], p = 0.019). The ratio was lower also with original push wire with transjugular access (0.34 ± 0.19 vs. 0.57 ± 0.11 [stiff wire] and 0.58 ± 0.17 [bent wire], p = 0.045). Filter jumping occurred more often with the transjugular approach with original push wire than with stiff or bent-wire delivery. Filter tip abutment to the IVC wall occurred only with the transfemoral approach. Conclusions: Bent wire with transfemoral access and original push wire with transjugular access had lower filter tilt ratio at Option IVC filter deployment. However, filter jumping was common using the original push wire with transjugular access.

show abstract

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%