Implementation of Inverse Hysteresis Model Into EMTP&amp;#x2014;Part II: Dynamic Model

Zirka, S. E.; Moroz, Y.I.; Chiesa, Nicola; Harrison, Robert G.; Høidalen, Hans Kristian

doi:10.1109/tpwrd.2015.2416199

Cited by 48 publications

(35 citation statements)

References 12 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…It is seen that inclusion of the skin effect causes additional terms in i hy as well as the eddy-current loss resistance R Fe . In addition, since b(z,t) and thus h hy (b(z, t)) are not constant along the lamination thickness, the integrations in (28) and (30) need to be carried out numerically. This is done using a set of m Gauss integration points z j and weights w j , j = 1, .…”

Section: Model With Skin Effectmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…. , n -1, b(z, t), and h hy (b(z, t)) are evaluated in these Gauss points z j and the integrations in (28) and (30) are obtained as the sum of the integrands weighted with w j . The values of α i (z j ) are assembled into an m × n matrix A such that A j i = α i (z j ), and the weights are assembled in a column vector w. Simulink implementation of the voltage equation (21) together with (28) and (30) is demonstrated in Fig.…”

Section: Model With Skin Effectmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…To our experience, the model of [28] clearly overrides Preisachtype hysteresis models [9] in its simpleness, computation speed, and numerical stability, and thus seems promising for analyzing devices with complex flux-density waveforms. Although [28] proposes coupling the HDHM to a numerical 1-D eddycurrent model in core laminations, in the practical applications mainly simplified dynamic eddy-current models tuned for grainoriented steels and sinusoidal excitations have been used for the simulations [30], [32], [33]. It is not clear if such models are suitable for applications including high-frequency switching harmonics.…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

Simulink Model for PWM-Supplied Laminated Magnetic Cores Including Hysteresis, Eddy-Current, and Excess Losses

Rasilo

Martínez

Fujisaki

et al. 2019

IEEE Trans. Power Electron.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

A new implementation of an iron-loss model for laminated magnetic cores in the MATLAB/Simulink environment is proposed in this paper. The model is based on numerically solving a one-dimensional diffusion problem for the eddy currents in the core lamination and applying an accurate hysteresis model as the constitutive law. An excess loss model is also considered. The model is identified merely based on the catalog data provided by the core material manufacturer. The implementation is validated with analytical and finite-element models and experimentally in the case of a toroidal inductor supplied from a GaN FET full-bridge inverter with 5-500 kHz switching frequencies and a deadtime of 300 ns. Despite the simple identification, a good correspondence is observed between the simulated and measured iron losses, the average difference being 3.3% over the wide switching frequency range. It is shown that accounting for the skin effect in the laminations is significant, in order to correctly model the iron losses at different switching frequencies. Some differences between the measured and simulated results at high switching frequencies are also discussed. The model is concluded to be applicable for designing and analyzing laminated magnetic cores in combination with power-electronics circuits. The Simulink models are openly available.

show abstract

Section: Model With Skin Effectmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Model With Skin Effectmentioning

confidence: 99%

mentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Simulink Model for PWM-Supplied Laminated Magnetic Cores Including Hysteresis, Eddy-Current, and Excess Losses

Rasilo

Martínez

Fujisaki

et al. 2019

IEEE Trans. Power Electron.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…[7][8][9][10] The magnetic flux density and magnetic field (magnetic quantities) in the original JA model are replaced by the flux linkage and current (electrical quantities) to facilitate the JA hysteresis model with the EMTP-type platforms. The modified static ψ-i JA model is defined as…”

Section: A ψ-I Ja Reactormentioning

confidence: 99%

Modeling of grain-oriented Si-steel and amorphous alloy iron core under ferroresonance using Jiles–Atherton hysteresis method

et al. 2017

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Amorphous alloy is increasingly widely used in the iron core of power transformer due to its excellent low loss performance. However, its potential harm to the power system is not fully studied during the electromagnetic transients of the transformer. This study develops a simulation model to analyze the effect of transformer iron core materials on ferroresonance. The model is based on the transformer π equivalent circuit. The flux linkage–current (ψ–i) Jiles–Atherton reactor is developed in an Electromagnetic Transients Program-Alternative Transients Program and is used to represent the magnetizing branches of the transformer model. Two ferroresonance cases are studied to compare the performance of grain-oriented Si-steel and amorphous alloy cores. The ferroresonance overvoltage and overcurrent are discussed under different system parameters. Results show that amorphous alloy transformer generates higher voltage and current than those of grain-oriented Si-steel transformer and significantly harms the power system safety.

show abstract

“…A valuable extension of [11] and [12] is presented in [13] where spline approximations for the magnetization curves make these models applicable to major loops of any shape, in both historydependent and history-independent models of magnetic hysteresis. Such approaches have then been implemented in the electromagnetic transients program environment, as described in [14] and [15].…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Fast and Versatile Inverse Hysteresis Model in Quasi-Static Regime: Derivation and Implementation in Simulink and PEEC Frameworks

2018

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

In this paper, a fast H(M) magnetostatic hysteresis model is presented, tested, and used in Simulink and partial element equivalent circuit (PEEC) environments. The model is primarily designed to achieve full compatibility with the current 3-D PEEC formalism for nonlinear isotropic magnetic materials, compatibility not met by any direct model. The capabilities of the proposed model are shown in stand-alone configuration and as a core of circuit components within the Simulink environment. Its effectiveness in the 3-D PEEC formulation is then demonstrated.

show abstract

Implementation of Inverse Hysteresis Model Into EMTP—Part II: Dynamic Model

Cited by 48 publications

References 12 publications

Simulink Model for PWM-Supplied Laminated Magnetic Cores Including Hysteresis, Eddy-Current, and Excess Losses

Simulink Model for PWM-Supplied Laminated Magnetic Cores Including Hysteresis, Eddy-Current, and Excess Losses

Modeling of grain-oriented Si-steel and amorphous alloy iron core under ferroresonance using Jiles–Atherton hysteresis method

Fast and Versatile Inverse Hysteresis Model in Quasi-Static Regime: Derivation and Implementation in Simulink and PEEC Frameworks

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About