Implementation of lung ultrasonography by general practitioners for lower respiratory tract infections: a feasibility study

Abstract

Objective To evaluate the feasibility of lung ultrasonography (LUS) performed by novice users’ general practitioners (GPs) in diagnosing lower respiratory tract infections (LRTIs) in primary health care settings. Design A prospective interventional multicenter study (December 2019–March 2020). Settings and subjects Patients aged >3 months, suspected of having LRTI consulting in three different general practices (GPs) (rural, semirural and urban) in France. Main outcome measures Feasibility of LUS by GPs was assessed by (1) the proportion of patients where LUS was not performed, (2) technical breakdowns, (3) interpretability of images by GPs, (4) examination duration and (5) patient perception and acceptability. Results A total of 151 patients were recruited, and GPs performed LUS for 111 (73.5%) patients (LUS group). In 99.1% ( n = 110) of cases, GPs indicated that they were able to interpret images. The median [IQR] exam duration was 4 [3–5] minutes. LRTI was diagnosed in 70.3% and 60% of patients in the LUS and no-LUS groups, respectively ( p = .43). After LUS, GPs changed their diagnosis from ‘other’ to ‘LRTI’ in six cases (+5.4%, p < .001), prescribed antibiotics for five patients (+4.5%, p = .164) and complementary chest imaging for 10 patients (+9%, p < .001). Patient stress was reported in 1.8% of cases, 81.7% of patients declared that they better understood the diagnosis, and 82% of patients thought that the GP diagnosis was more reliable after LUS. Conclusions LUS by GPs using handheld devices is a feasible diagnostic tool in primary health care for LRTI symptoms, demonstrating both effectiveness and positive patient reception. Trial Registration Number Clinicaltrial.gov: NCT04602234, 20/10/2020.

Yonder: Rural generalists, mental health of refugees, end-of-career GP reflections, and lung ultrasonography

“…Lung ultrasonography. Point-of-care lung ultrasound (POCLUS) could, according to the authors of this French study, 4 be implemented into the 'routine toolkit of GPs'. It's not a skill I have come across in any in-hours, practice-based GPs in the UK, but it is anecdotally more common in those working in urgent or emergency settings.…”