Implementation of mathematics education research as crossing the boundary between disciplined inquiry and teacher inquiry

Pinto, Alon; Koichu, Boris

doi:10.1007/s11858-021-01286-7

Cited by 7 publications

(6 citation statements)

References 19 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…This paper was written to introduce the notion of triangulation used by social science researchers since the mid of the last century [26,27] into the context of mathematics education as a field of disciplined inquiry [52,53]. The paper suggested that triangulation in mathematics education can be interpreted as the use of multiple ways of solving a problem.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Advancing the concept of triangulation from social sciences research to mathematics education

Abramovich

2022

Adv Educ Res Eval

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The paper suggests interpreting the term triangulation, commonly used in social science research, as multiple ways of solving a problem in the context of mathematics education. The availability of different technological tools provides new perspectives on problem solving as modeling from where ideas for problem posing stem. Using topics from geometry and trigonometry, triangulation is considered through lens of teacher education. Reflections by teacher candidates on activities which are shared and reviewed in the paper indicate future teachers’ readiness to implement the pedagogy of triangulated perspectives on problem solving and posing in their own mathematics classrooms.

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Advancing the concept of triangulation from social sciences research to mathematics education

Abramovich

2022

Adv Educ Res Eval

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…We now turn to examples of local implementation in this SI. Four studies, namely those by Hwang (2021), Diego-Mantecón et al (2021), Kontorovich and Bartlett (2021) and Pinto and Koichu (2021), belong to this category. The unifying feature of these studies is that they operate with interaction-based objects of implementation (see Sect.…”

Section: Implementation Vs Scaling Upmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…In both cases, scaling up of the implementation is not considered as realistic. Scenario (ii) is present in the study by Pinto and Koichu (2021): researchers offer an innovative PD program, in which experienced teacher-participants enter the shoes of education researchers and implement the innovation-teaching aligned with the educational research cycle-in order to improve aspects of their teaching. Scaling up is uncertain.…”

Section: Configurations Of Stakeholders In Implementationmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…4.4). In three cases of local implementation included in this SI (Cai & Hwang, 2021;Kontorovich & Bartlett, 2021;Pinto & Koichu, 2021), special attention was given to artefacts supporting implementation. Cai and Hwang (2021) give special merit to tangible artefacts that emerge from teaching.…”

Section: Implementability Of Mathematics Education Researchmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Finally, implementability of research experiences is considered in two studies of the SI. It is the main topic of the study by Pinto and Koichu (2021), and an aspect of the developmental model of Jaworski and Potari (2021). In particular, Pinto and Koichu's ( 2021) study shows how the border between practices of disciplined inquiry (i.e., research practices) and of teacher inquiry can be blurred when both parties productively collaborate over specially designed boundary objects without an expectation of reaching full consensus.…”

Section: Implementability Of Mathematics Education Researchmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

Implementation-related research in mathematics education: the search for identity

Koichu

Aguilar

Misfeldt

2021

ZDM Mathematics Education

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Implementation has always been a paramount concern of mathematics education, but only recently has the conceptualizing and theorizing work on implementation as a phenomenon begun in our field. In this survey paper, we conduct a hermeneutic review of mathematics education research identified as related to the implementation problematics. The first cycle of the review is based on examples of studies published in mathematics education journals during the last 40 years. It is organized according to five reasons for developing implementation research. The second cycle concerns 15 papers included in this special issue and is organized by four themes, as follows: objects of implementation, stakeholders in implementation, implementation vs. scaling up, and implementability of mathematics education research. The paper is concluded with a refined glossary of implementation-related terms and suggestions for future research.

show abstract

When Theory Should Guide Action, What Kind of Theorizing Do We Need?

Prediger,

Jackson,

Koichu

2024

Springer International Handbooks of Education

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Implementation of mathematics education research as crossing the boundary between disciplined inquiry and teacher inquiry

Cited by 7 publications

References 19 publications

Advancing the concept of triangulation from social sciences research to mathematics education

Advancing the concept of triangulation from social sciences research to mathematics education

Implementation-related research in mathematics education: the search for identity

When Theory Should Guide Action, What Kind of Theorizing Do We Need?

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About