2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.esmoop.2022.100459
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Implementation of preventive and predictive BRCA testing in patients with breast, ovarian, pancreatic, and prostate cancer: a position paper of Italian Scientific Societies

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
18
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
1
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The implementation and clarification of the criteria for accessing the genetic testing in patients with PDAC and their families is warranted. In certain European contexts, such as in Italy, although the guideline remains restrictive (i.e., only the analysis of the PVs of BRCA1/2 is foreseen) [ 21 ], scientific societies, such as the Italian Association for the Study of the Pancreas (AISP), promoted a registry of subjects at increased risk of PDAC, starting a parallel prevention program [ 40 ]. The access criteria of this registry, in line with international recommendations [ 40 ], include the presence of PVs in several genes ( BRCA1/2 , CDKN2A , PALB1 , STK11 , and MMR, and, recently, ATM ) [ 40 , 41 , 42 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The implementation and clarification of the criteria for accessing the genetic testing in patients with PDAC and their families is warranted. In certain European contexts, such as in Italy, although the guideline remains restrictive (i.e., only the analysis of the PVs of BRCA1/2 is foreseen) [ 21 ], scientific societies, such as the Italian Association for the Study of the Pancreas (AISP), promoted a registry of subjects at increased risk of PDAC, starting a parallel prevention program [ 40 ]. The access criteria of this registry, in line with international recommendations [ 40 ], include the presence of PVs in several genes ( BRCA1/2 , CDKN2A , PALB1 , STK11 , and MMR, and, recently, ATM ) [ 40 , 41 , 42 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The current NCCN guideline [ 17 ] recommends that all patients affected by PDAC undergo germline genetic testing irrespectively of other factors (i.e., family history, age, synchronous/metachronous neoplasms). Oher guidelines for the genetic testing of patients with PDAC are rather restrictive, indicating the analysis of BRCA 1/2 only in patients with metastatic neoplasia (for accessing second-line chemotherapy), and in subjects with a relevant family history (i.e., at least two first-degree relatives with PDAC or ≥three members diagnosed with PDAC) [ 21 , 22 , 23 ]. Testing for PVs in other genes is regulated by guidelines concerning organ-specific predisposing syndromes (i.e., CRC, breast cancer, gynecological cancer, and melanoma).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There were also appreciable numbers of patients in the United States (18%) and the EU4 (10%), but not Israel, who received s BRCA1/2 mut-only testing. Although patients with metastatic breast cancer with an s BRCA1/2 mut have been shown to respond to PARPi [ 23 , 24 ], PARPi have not been approved to treat this patient group. The ESMO international consensus guidelines indicate that the therapeutic implications of s BRCA1/2 mut in patients with breast cancer need further evaluation and should not be used for decision-making in clinical practice [ 9 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are currently some clear criteria for conducting genetic counseling and testing for BRCA1/BRCA2 status in patients with BC [32][33][34][35]. It is recommended mainly in patients with some personal and family history (e.g.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%