2022
DOI: 10.9745/ghsp-d-21-00349
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Implementation of Refugees' Inclusion in National Viral Hepatitis B and Hepatitis C Screening Campaign in Mahama Refugee Camp, Rwanda

Abstract: Conducting a mass screening campaign for Hepatitis B and Hepatitis C viruses was a feasible, effective, and low-cost strategy to integrate refugees into Rwanda's national hepatitis prevention and management program.n Coordination across national-, district-, and community-level stakeholders, as well as real-time data analysis, are critical for implementing a wellcoordinated, high-quality campaign and supported high screening coverage. n This campaign provided an opportunity to identify clients who were eligibl… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

3
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This lack of knowledge may prevent patients from accessing appropriate care, as has been discussed previously (34). Investing in high-quality electronic data collection during screening campaigns, using mobile hepatitis treatment clinics to provide decentralized care, a three strategies that we have used to successfully mitigate those problems (32,35). However, even within our targeted screening campaign, there were substantial gaps in linkage to care, particularly among NCD patients who screened positive for HBsAg.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…This lack of knowledge may prevent patients from accessing appropriate care, as has been discussed previously (34). Investing in high-quality electronic data collection during screening campaigns, using mobile hepatitis treatment clinics to provide decentralized care, a three strategies that we have used to successfully mitigate those problems (32,35). However, even within our targeted screening campaign, there were substantial gaps in linkage to care, particularly among NCD patients who screened positive for HBsAg.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…We categorized costs into staff and administration, training supplies, transportation costs, screening day costs, and medical supplies and materials. 27 Staff costs were further broken down into PIH/IMB permanent staff (nurses and program administrators), hospital clinical staff (radiology technicians, nurses, and internist physician), data collectors, and a consulting radiologist who were hired for this program. Volunteer staff time was not included in the costing calculations.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%