Implementation of Screening, Brief Intervention, and Referral to Treatment for Adolescents in Pediatric Primary Care

Abstract

IMPORTANCE Early intervention for substance use is critical to improving adolescent outcomes. Studies have found promising results for Screening, Brief Intervention, and Referral to Treatment (SBIRT), but little research has examined implementation.OBJECTIVE To compare SBIRT implementation in pediatric primary care among trained pediatricians, pediatricians working in coordination with embedded behavioral health care practitioners (BHCPs), and usual care (UC). DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTSThe study is a 2-year (November 1, 2011, through October 31, 2013), nonblinded, cluster randomized, hybrid implementation and effectiveness trial examining SBIRT implementation outcomes across 2 modalities of implementation and UC. Fifty-two pediatricians from a large general pediatrics clinic in an integrated health care system were randomized to 1 of 3 SBIRT implementation arms; patients aged 12 to 18 years were eligible.INTERVENTIONS Two modes of SBIRT implementation, (1) pediatrician only (pediatricians trained to provide SBIRT) and (2) embedded BHCP (BHCP trained to provide SBIRT), and(3) UC.MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES Implementation of SBIRT (primary outcome), which included assessments, brief interventions, and referrals to specialty substance use and mental health treatment. RESULTSThe final sample included 1871 eligible patients among 47 pediatricians; health care professional characteristics did not differ across study arms. Patients in the pediatrician-only (adjusted odds ratio [AOR], 10.37; 95% CI, 5.45-19.74; P < .001) and the embedded BHCP (AOR, 18.09; 95% CI, 9.69-33.77; P < .001) arms had higher odds of receiving brief interventions compared with patients in the UC arm. Patients in the embedded BHCP arm were more likely to receive brief interventions compared with those in the pediatrician-only arm (AOR, 1.74; 95% CI, 1.31-2.31; P < .001). The embedded BHCP arm had lower odds of receiving a referral compared with the pediatrician-only (AOR, 0.58; 95% CI, 0.43-0.78; P < .001) and UC (AOR, 0.65; 95% CI, 0.48-0.89; P = .006) arms; odds of referrals did not differ between the pediatrician-only and UC arms. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCEThe intervention arms had better screening, assessment, and brief intervention rates than the UC arm. Patients in the pediatrician-only and UC arms had higher odds of being referred to specialty treatment than those in the embedded BHCP arm, suggesting lingering barriers to having pediatricians fully address substance use in primary care. Findings also highlight age and ethnic groups less likely to receive these important services.

A brief eHealth tool delivered in primary care to help parents prevent childhood obesity: a randomized controlled trial

“…To our knowledge, RIPPLE represents the first parent‐based SBIRT designed to prevent childhood obesity in primary care. Similar to other recent reports , our SBIRT was feasible to integrate into the day‐to‐day activities of a busy clinical setting. Of those invited to participate, nearly 85% were enrolled, a finding consistent with the upper end of recruitment proportions (i.e.…”

Point Prevalence of Co-Occurring Behavioral Health Conditions and Associated Chronic Disease Burden Among Adolescents

“…There is a growing body of literature suggesting that screening, brief intervention, and referral to treatment (SBIRT) can be an effective approach to integrating the identification and brief treatment into pediatric primary care settings. [44][45][46] Similarly, a recent systematic meta-analysis found significantly better outcomes across studies for adolescents treated for mental health problems using an integrated medical-behavioral health approach. 47 Such approaches are also consistent with the patientcentered medical home model, which uses a team-based approach to care and frequently integrates behavioral health services into primary care.…”

Development and Evaluation of a Short Adverse Childhood Experiences Measure

“…Increasingly, healthcare systems are developing integrated delivery services using primary care—based screening, intervention, and referral to address behavioral and mental health problems. 46–49 The current model involves screening followed by interventions in the primary care setting if substance use or mental health disorders are identified, reserving referral to intensive services for patients with more-severe disorders. Patients with significant childhood adversity may represent a population in need of more-intensive behavioral or mental health services.…”