2023
DOI: 10.1080/07434618.2023.2197060
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Implementation of the C-BiLLT, an accessible instrument to assess language comprehension in children with limited motor and speech function: an international clinician survey

Abstract: The authors would like to thank all participating clinicians for sharing their experiences and expertise, Johanna Geytenbeek for sharing her database of names, Samantha Yimeng Dong for the illustration, and Audrée Leclerc for her help with reliability coding. The authors report no conflicts of interest.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

1
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(2 citation statements)
references
References 62 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Normative data are available for children aged 18 months to 7 years (19). The C-BiLLT is currently used clinically and in research in several European countries (e.g., 29,30,31).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Normative data are available for children aged 18 months to 7 years (19). The C-BiLLT is currently used clinically and in research in several European countries (e.g., 29,30,31).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While these psychometric properties indicate the C-BiLLT-CAN may be valid for measuring language comprehension in Canadian children, the COVID-19 pandemic prevented completion of the feasibility testing component of the study with children with CP and LFS. Though the aim of the feasibility component was not fully addressed, preliminary data from 9 Canadian children with CP foreshadowed potential challenges to C-BiLLT-CAN implementation speci cally pertaining to response methods that had not been identi ed in European studies (29,30). Only 4 out of 9 children were able to complete the C-BiLLT-CAN; challenges to completion typically related to the test equipment and/or available response methods and included problems using eye gaze (e.g., di culty maintaining contact with the screen when using their own eye gaze system, inexperience and/or confounding cognitive issues affecting use of the C-BiLLT-CAN's eye gaze system), switch access (e.g., could use head mouse to point to, but not select, C-BiLLT test items), or failure to nd a compatible response method all together (32).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%