2016
DOI: 10.17265/2328-2150/2016.07.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Implementation of the Masquelet Technique in Complicated Septic Non-union of the Ulna—A Case Report

Abstract: Long bone septic non-union by MRSA (methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus) is always a challenge for the orthopaedic society. Traditional treatment options include distraction osteogenesis methods and vascularised bone grafting. These techniques require a high level of expertise and are frequently involved with a variety of side effects or complications. We present a rare case of ulnar fracture complicated by MRSA infection that led to septic non-union. We treated the septic non union with the technique … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(2 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The induced membrane technique was the most frequent reconstruction strategy employed across all included papers. Seventeen publications, comprising 96 patients (30%), reported on the use of this modality [4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20]. The majority of cases (n = 63, 66%) were post-osteomyelitis bone defects and stability was conferred using plate fixation in most cases (n = 84, 88%).…”
Section: Induced Membrane Techniquementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The induced membrane technique was the most frequent reconstruction strategy employed across all included papers. Seventeen publications, comprising 96 patients (30%), reported on the use of this modality [4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20]. The majority of cases (n = 63, 66%) were post-osteomyelitis bone defects and stability was conferred using plate fixation in most cases (n = 84, 88%).…”
Section: Induced Membrane Techniquementioning
confidence: 99%
“…A total of 184 individuals across 31 publications underwent reconstruction of a defect of a single forearm bone [4,6,8,9,10,11,14,16,17,18,19,20,21,22,25,26,28,31,33,35,36,38,39,40,41,42,43,48] (Table 3). Bone transport and the induced membrane technique were employed to reconstruct defects with mean sizes of 44.3 mm and 46.8 mm respectively.…”
Section: Forearm Single-bone Defects (Radius or Ulna Defects)mentioning
confidence: 99%