2020
DOI: 10.1002/nop2.524
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Implementation of the Perinatal Death Surveillance and Response guidelines: Lessons from annual health system strengthening interventions in the Rwenzori Sub‐Region, Western Uganda

Abstract: Aim To determine the health facility‐based perinatal mortality rate, its causes and avoidable factors using the perinatal mortality surveillance and response guidelines. Design This was an action study conducted in one of the districts in Western Uganda from 1 January–31 December 2019. Methods A total of 20 perinatal death cases were recruited consecutively. Data were collected using a Ministry of Health Perinatal Death Surveillance and Respo… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Investing in sense making efforts and creating more awareness about the characteristics that distinguish the MPDSR policy from other interventions, its benefits, aims and objectives, processes involved, activities, inputs and outputs, as well as implementation barriers and facilitators, may contribute to success. While previous efforts have been geared towards understanding the barriers and facilitators to implementations (50,(75)(76)(77)(78) further studies aimed at differentiating implementation of the MPDSR policy from other interventions could enable implementers to devise context-appropriate mechanisms and strategies to enhance integration and embedding within specific contexts (e.g., district vs. health facility).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Investing in sense making efforts and creating more awareness about the characteristics that distinguish the MPDSR policy from other interventions, its benefits, aims and objectives, processes involved, activities, inputs and outputs, as well as implementation barriers and facilitators, may contribute to success. While previous efforts have been geared towards understanding the barriers and facilitators to implementations (50,(75)(76)(77)(78) further studies aimed at differentiating implementation of the MPDSR policy from other interventions could enable implementers to devise context-appropriate mechanisms and strategies to enhance integration and embedding within specific contexts (e.g., district vs. health facility).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since the inception of the MPDSR policy in Uganda, there have not been empirical studies conducted across the health system to assess its implementation. Previous efforts have explored implementation of the policy in one facility or across facilities funded by a particular implementing partner (75)(76)(77)(78). However, the design of this study has helped generate findings across various levels of care without being limited to a particular funding agency or implementing partner.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The team activated immediately after detecting a severe non-reassuring fetus would resolve the problem of severe hypoxic-ischaemic encephalopathy or perinatal death [ 23 – 25 ]. Timely and appropriate intervention by the in-utero resuscitation technique during non-reassuring fetal status includes changing maternal position, oxygen administration, uterine relaxation and an intravenous fluid bolus to reduce severe hypoxia [ 23 , 26 28 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…33, No.2, 2022; doi 10.47985/dcidj.506 challenges when trying to access such services, including negative perceptions of health personnel, disability-unfriendly infrastructures at health facilities and the absence of trained personnel to provide targeted care to people with disabilities (Rugoho & Maphosa, 2017). Other difficulties include the communication gap, especially when communicating with women who are aphasic, blind or deaf ( Masereka, Naturinda, Tumusiime & Munguiko, 2020). This is compounded by the inability of many women with disabilities to protect themselves, the isolation in which they may live, and dependency on others as compared to their counterparts without any form of disability (Spratt, 2013).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%