Implementation of the semi-aerobic landfill system (Fukuoka method) in developing countries: A Malaysia cost analysis

Monitoring transitory profiles of leachate humic substances in landfill aeration reactors in mesophilic and thermophilic conditions

“…To optimize the aeration process, a series of operation parameters has been studied such as air pressure, aeration rate, air injection mode (active or passive, continuous or intermittent), aeration efficiency, moisture and temperature control, and off-gas treatment [6,[11][12][13][14][15][16][17].…”

Biogas Estimation as a Basis for the Implementation of an Intermunicipal Landfill: Michoacan, Mexico

“…A study carried out in Malaysian involves three important aspects to determine the cost: cost of investment, operation and maintenance and, closure; with a unit total cost of 8.89 USD•t −1 [22]. According to the results obtained in this study, only the first three cases are acceptable.…”

THEORETICAL ESTIMATION OF CO2eq MITIGATION, IMPLEMENTING A LANDFILL WITH CAPTURE OF BIOGAS APPLIED TO THE LERMA-CHAPALA REGION IN MICHOACAN, MEXICO

“…Note: Petroleum Mexican Export Mix (MME). The results were compared to the costs of a new landfill, which included fixed and operating costs as well as the costs of closing the site (8.89 USD ton -1 ) [16]; and the benefits were obtained only for the substitution of gasoline, diesel and LP gas, whilst for the BEP and electric power the results were negative (Table 8); however, the negative results can be reversible and attractive, since oil could increase in price in the short and medium term, and electric power could be applied for higher rates. Burning biogas directly will avoid 890,361 ton of CO 2 eq, whilst 147,456 ton of CO 2 would be avoided by using it to generate electric power instead of fossil fuels (CO 2 eq obtained by burning biogas is included in the natural cycle of carbon).…”