2021
DOI: 10.1088/1742-6596/1899/1/012075
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Implementation of the Simple Multi Attribute Ranking Technique Method as a Model for Decision Making in Determining the Talents and Interests of Children in Continuing Education

Abstract: Talent and interest are very influential on students in the process of their development and learning. This is because every child needs an education program that matches their talents and interests. Many problems occur due to mistakes of parents or teachers in determining talent and asking students so mistakes in determining education still tend to be incorrect. So students find it difficult to adapt to the education they face because it is not in accordance with their abilities and potential. Therefore, we n… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 1 publication
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…MCDA is based on the selection/ranking of the best alternative among the proposed alternatives using decision criteria that need to be prioritized. There are different methods for prioritizing criteria and/or alternatives, such as the Simple Multiattribute Ranking Technique (SMART) 25 , Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) 26 , Analytic Network Process (ANP) 27 , Best Worst Method (BWM) 28 , 29 , FUll COnsistency Method (FUCOM) 30 , 31 , goal programming 32 , 33 and Logarithm Methodology of Additive Weights (LMAW) 34 – 36 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…MCDA is based on the selection/ranking of the best alternative among the proposed alternatives using decision criteria that need to be prioritized. There are different methods for prioritizing criteria and/or alternatives, such as the Simple Multiattribute Ranking Technique (SMART) 25 , Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) 26 , Analytic Network Process (ANP) 27 , Best Worst Method (BWM) 28 , 29 , FUll COnsistency Method (FUCOM) 30 , 31 , goal programming 32 , 33 and Logarithm Methodology of Additive Weights (LMAW) 34 – 36 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%