2002 IEEE International Symposium on Circuits and Systems. Proceedings (Cat. No.02CH37353)
DOI: 10.1109/iscas.2002.1010374
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Implementation of the transposed Farrow structure

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
18
0

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…(1) There are always high ripple values between the image frequencies. Therefore, a uniform stopband would require extremely high values for N and M. (2) The length of the prefilter is 11.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…(1) There are always high ripple values between the image frequencies. Therefore, a uniform stopband would require extremely high values for N and M. (2) The length of the prefilter is 11.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, it does not offer good anti-aliasing properties for applications where the sampling rate is decreased (decimation). A better solution for decimation is the transposed Farrow structure, where the piecewise polynomial impulse response is determined not for the input but for the output sampling intervals [2], [9], [21]. Therefore, the transposed Farrow structure offers the same attenuation in the aliasing bands as the original structure in the imaging bands if the same polynomial coefficients are used.…”
Section: The Farrow Structurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Farrow structure is efficient for interpolation whereas, for decimation, it is better to use the transposed Farrow structure, as discussed in Babic et al (2002); Hentschel & Fettweis (2000).…”
Section: Sampling Rate Conversion: Farrow Structurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Generally, S k (z) are designed so that H(z) approximates an allpass transfer function with FD of μ over the frequency range of interest according to Babic et al (2002); Johansson & Hermanowicz (2006); Johansson & Löwenborg (2003); Pun et al (2003);Tseng (2002); Vesma & Saramäki (1996;2000). The desired causal magnitude and unwrapped…”
Section: Sampling Rate Conversion: Farrow Structurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Farrow structure is efficient for interpolation whereas, for decimation, it is better to use the transposed Farrow structure [2,17]. These two options are therefore used accordingly in the proposed TMUXs, as seen later in Figs.…”
Section: Farrow Structurementioning
confidence: 99%