2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.telpol.2012.09.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Implementation of three network convergence in China: A new institutional analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although both SARFT and NCAC are organizationally under China’s Ministry of Culture, SARFT is also simultaneously administered by the State Council and the Propaganda Department of the Chinese Communist Party. Thus, according to Wu and Leung (2012: 957), SARFT has an inherent institutional orientation of ideological control and is—to a certain degree—superior to other ministries in the power strata of China’s media regulation. Consequentially, in the very beginning, the superior power position and the underpinning ideological orientation of SARFT always brought itself into conflict with the legal and economic logic of copyright enforcement in China’s online video industry so that copyright protection actions were poorly and even improperly executed.…”
Section: Decline Of Online Video Piracy and Institutionalization Of Cmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Although both SARFT and NCAC are organizationally under China’s Ministry of Culture, SARFT is also simultaneously administered by the State Council and the Propaganda Department of the Chinese Communist Party. Thus, according to Wu and Leung (2012: 957), SARFT has an inherent institutional orientation of ideological control and is—to a certain degree—superior to other ministries in the power strata of China’s media regulation. Consequentially, in the very beginning, the superior power position and the underpinning ideological orientation of SARFT always brought itself into conflict with the legal and economic logic of copyright enforcement in China’s online video industry so that copyright protection actions were poorly and even improperly executed.…”
Section: Decline Of Online Video Piracy and Institutionalization Of Cmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This regulation campaign is actually an indicator of the ‘interinstitutional incompatibilities’ between SARFT and MIIT (Seo and Creed, 2002: 226). Compared to MIIT, whose gravity is laid on economic aspects, SARFT pays less attention to the market logic of online videos since ‘adapting to market changes was incompatible with its ideological orientations’ (Wu and Leung, 2012: 959). Therefore, Le (2009) suggests that the regulation storm was nothing but a media ownership war that betrayed an overt bias against private online video firms within the MIIT camp.…”
Section: Decline Of Online Video Piracy and Institutionalization Of Cmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As one interviewee recalled, 'Shanda was moving the cheese of the SARFT and it was certainly risky to go ahead before the dust settled between regulatory authorities'. The conflicting interests between broadcast and telecom sectors as well as relevant regulatory authorities, SARFT and MIIT, is in fact a major reason behind the slow, zigzag progress of the state-initiated convergence project (Wu & Leung, 2012;Zhang, 2003). As broadcasting and telecom industries have long been dominated by state-owned or controlled enterprises, industry and regulatory stakeholders have been trying to maintain such dominance in their own spaces while eyeing for new business opportunities.…”
Section: A Precedent To the Recent Wave Of Ott Streaming In Chinamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In comparison with China's telecom operators which compete in nationwide markets, China's cable operators lack business resources and market experience [17]. A majority are short of the funds necessary to upgrade their cable networks from mono-directional to bidirectional networks.…”
Section: Overviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Firstly, by combining theoretical analysis with empirical research, it helps to explain the complexity of industry convergence. The extant literature on industry convergence generally uses concept frameworks and case studies [15][16][17], although a few quantitative investigations have focused on measuring industry convergence [2,18]. The perspective of an industry platform is useful to understand firm conduct in a converging industry [19,20], while the traditional theoretical framework of industrial organization enables analysis of firm conduct in industries where market boundaries are clear [21].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%