2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.envint.2018.02.027
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Implementation of USEPA RfD and SFO for improved risk assessment of organophosphate esters (organophosphate flame retardants and plasticizers)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
26
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 76 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
0
26
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Last, dermal exposure through the use of nail polish may result in exposures as high as 5000 ng/kg./day (Tokumura et al 2019). While our implemented dose is higher than the typical human exposure, it is lower than that in studies used to derive a nonregulatory reference dose for TPhP (70 mg/kg/day) (Li et al 2018) as well as the recently set benchmark dose of 19 mg/kg/day (NTP 2018).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Last, dermal exposure through the use of nail polish may result in exposures as high as 5000 ng/kg./day (Tokumura et al 2019). While our implemented dose is higher than the typical human exposure, it is lower than that in studies used to derive a nonregulatory reference dose for TPhP (70 mg/kg/day) (Li et al 2018) as well as the recently set benchmark dose of 19 mg/kg/day (NTP 2018).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The calculated HQs were always within the acceptable level (HQ <1) (U.S. EPA 2017) ( Table 2). The calculated CRs were also within the acceptable level of 10 −6 for all individual/classes of compounds, except for DEHP in both Europe and Asia (classified as within an area of concern) (Li et al 2018; U.S. EPA 2017) (Table 2). However, the exposure of the population to DEHP is expected to decrease due to its replacement with alternative plasticizers in both food processing equipment and packaging materials (Giovanoulis et al 2018), complying with a recent EU restriction because of its reproductive toxicity and endocrine disrupting properties (EC 2018).…”
Section: Evaluation Of Chemical Safety Of Edible Insectsmentioning
confidence: 63%
“…The potential risk of noncarcinogenic effects [hazard quotient (HQ)] per individual/class of compounds was calculated by dividing the total EDI (in milligrams per kilogram BW per day) by the relative oral reference dose factor (RfD, in milligrams per kilogram BW per day) ( Table 2). HQ values ≥1 indicate a potential exposure risk for the population (Li et al 2018;Poma et al 2018;Qian et al 2017; U.S. EPA 2017). The potential carcinogenic risk (CR) was calculated by multiplying the EDI (in milligrams per kilogram BW per day) by the relative oral cancer slope factor (SFO; in milligrams per kilogram BW per day) ( Table 2).…”
Section: Dietary Exposure Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Our in vivo dose is higher than the human average daily intake of triphenyl phosphate among 25-30 year old females (0.8 ng/kg-body weight-per day) and same age group males (1.6 ng/kg-body weight-per day) of 8 population groups in the FDA's monitoring program for chemical contaminants in the U.S. food supply (Gunderson 1988). However, our implemented dose is lower than that of studies that used a dose (70mg/kg/day) from an old in vivo TPhP exposure study in male Holtzman rats (Sutton et al 1960) to derive a non-regulatory reference dose for TPhP (Ali et al 2012;Li et al 2018). Our TPhP dose is also in the lowermiddle range of recent in vivo exposure studies as one recent study exposed C57Bl/6 dams to 0, 5, 25, or 50 mg/kg TPhP via intraperitoneal injection (Philbrook et al 2018), and National Toxicology Program (NTP) recently exposed male Harlan Sprague Dawley rats to 0, 55, 110, 220, 441, and 881 mg/kg TPHP daily for 4 days by oral gavage (National Toxicology Program 2018).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%