Implementation science issues in understanding, collecting, and using cost estimates: a multi-stakeholder perspective

Abstract

Understanding the resources needed to achieve desired implementation and effectiveness outcomes is essential to implementing and sustaining evidence-based practices (EBPs). Despite this frequent observation, cost and economic measurement and reporting are rare, but becoming more frequent in implementation science, and when present is seldom reported from the perspective of multiple stakeholders (e.g., the organization, supervisory team), including those who will ultimately implement and sustain EBPs.Incorporating a multi-level framework is useful for understanding and integrating the perspectives and priorities of the diverse set of stakeholders involved in implementation. Stakeholders across levels, from patients to delivery staff to health systems, experience different economic impacts (costs, benefit, and value) related to EBP implementation and have different perspectives on these issues. Economic theory can aid in understanding multi-level perspectives and approaches to addressing potential conflict across perspectives.This paper provides examples of key cost components especially important to different types of stakeholders. It provides specific guidance and recommendations for cost assessment activities that address the concerns of various stakeholder groups, identifies areas of agreement and conflict in priorities, and outlines theoretically informed approaches to understanding conflicts among stakeholder groups and processes to address them. Involving stakeholders throughout the implementation process and presenting economic information in ways that are clear and meaningful to different stakeholder groups can aid in maximizing benefits within the context of limited resources. We posit that such approaches are vital to advancing economic evaluation in implementation science. Finally, we identify directions for future research and application.Considering a range of stakeholders is critical to informing economic evaluation that will support appropriate decisions about resource allocation across contexts to inform decisions about successful adoption, implementation, and sustainment. Not all perspectives need to be addressed in a given project but identifying and understanding perspectives of multiple groups of key stakeholders including patients and direct implementation staff not often explicitly considered in traditional economic evaluation are needed in implementation research.

Health economic evaluation of digital nursing technologies: a review of methodological recommendations

“…These perspectives and the specific outcomes, as well as specific cost measurements, need to be brought together for understanding, collecting, and using cost estimates in a DNT multi-stakeholder perspective. In particular, conflicts in prioritising specific groups and their benefits must be taken into account [ 51 ].…”

Engaging Underserved Communities in COVID-19 Health Equity Implementation Research: An Analysis of Community Engagement Resource Needs and Costs

“…Time spent on coordinating with community participants outside of meetings should not be underestimated and can require substantial amount of staff time especially in the startup phase of the project. Finally, in line with the call from Eisman et al (9) to consider costs of implementation from multiple stakeholder perspectives, it can be beneficial to develop a pragmatic approach to documenting costs associated with engaging community partners developing and using a template (such as the one we provided in Supplementary Materials). Since key resource categories will vary across projects, templates should be adapted iteratively in collaboration with community partners.…”

How to improve the quality of World Psychiatric Association educational activities? Results from an online survey with World Psychiatric Association zonal representatives

“…This collaborative approach represents an essential element for improving mental health care worldwide and harnessing stigma attached to mental disorders, since many stereotypes and misconceptions on people with mental disorders are frequent in primary care settings (Evans‐Lacko et al, 2014; Thornicroft et al, 2019; Unützer et al, 2020). Another important element is the collaboration with all community stakeholders, which can foster the dissemination of correct information on mental health and mental disorders to the different target populations (Eisman et al, 2021; Fuss et al, 2019; McGorry & Nelson, 2019).…”