2014
DOI: 10.1007/s13142-014-0268-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Implementing a brief evidence-based HIV intervention: a mixed methods examination of compliance fidelity

Abstract: Dissemination of HIV behavioral prevention programs has increased the reach of evidence-based interventions, but there is a paucity of data on implementation and diffusion. The present mixed methods study focused on RESPECT, a brief counseling and testing intervention, examining compliance fidelity and the extent to which Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) policies and training have diffused to practice settings. Using client exit surveys (N = 830) and counselor interviews (N = 64), we examined i… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

1
3
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
1
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…After weighting participants, many main effects of Condition on sexual behaviors disappeared as expected, and there were many significant effects of risk behavior declining over time, especially for participants who had been recently sexually active at baseline. The results of this study further support research that indicates that brief interventions such CTR can be an effective [21,23] and cost-effective [24] HIV prevention intervention with broad reach, including for the most vulnerable populations [25].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 79%
“…After weighting participants, many main effects of Condition on sexual behaviors disappeared as expected, and there were many significant effects of risk behavior declining over time, especially for participants who had been recently sexually active at baseline. The results of this study further support research that indicates that brief interventions such CTR can be an effective [21,23] and cost-effective [24] HIV prevention intervention with broad reach, including for the most vulnerable populations [25].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 79%
“… a Project RESPECT = data from translation of project RESPECT (see references [ 28 – 30 ]). RCT = data from the original RESPET randomized controlled trial (see references [ 24 , 25 ]).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To resolve this issue, staff opted to de-couple RESPECT from testing, offer the intervention to HIV-positive individuals, and leverage relationships with other staff to increase referral of HIV-positive individuals who would potentially benefit from intervention. Although it is likely that many agencies implementing RESPECT did not adapt the program in this way, a national-level study shows that other agencies delivered RESPECT to HIV-positive clients [20], and RESPECT was approved to be delivered without testing [19]. After RE-SPECT was de-adopted, however, staff from other programs at the agency continued to refer clients to RESPECT, leading to frequent negative interactions with misinformed clients and confused staff.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%