Implementing a new emergency department: a qualitative study of health professionals’ change responses and perceptions

Abstract

Background The aim of the study is two-fold. It explores how managers and key employees at the Emergency Department (ED) and specialist departments in a university hospital in the Capital Region of Denmark respond to the planned change to a new ED, and how they perceive the change involved in the implementation of the new ED. The study investigates what happens when health professionals are confronted with implementation of policy that changes their organization and everyday work lives. Few studies provide in-depth investigations of health professionals’ reactions to the implementation of new EDs, and particularly how they influence the implementation of a nationwide organizational change framed within a political strategy. Methods The study used semi-structured individual interviews with 51 health professionals involved in implementation activities related to an organizational change of establishing a new ED with new patient pathways for acutely ill patients. The data was deductively analyzed using Leon Coetsee’s theoretical framework of change responses, but the analysis also allowed for a more inductive reading of the material. Results Fourteen types of responses to establishing a new ED were identified and mapped onto six of the seven overall change responses in Coetsee’s framework. The participants perceived the change as particularly three changes. Firstly, they wished to create the best possible acute patient pathway in relation to their specialty. Whether the planned new ED would redeem this was disputed. Secondly, participants perceived the change as relocation to a new building, which both posed potentials and worries. Thirdly, both hopeful and frustrated statements were given about the newly established medical specialty of emergency medicine (EM), which was connected to the success of the new ED. Conclusions The study showcases how implementation processes within health care are not straightforward and that it is not only the content of the implementation that determines the success of the implementation and its outcomes but also how these are perceived by managers and employees responsible for the process and their context. In this way, managers must recognize that it cannot be pre-determined how implementation will proceed, which necessitates fluid implementation plans and demands implementation managements skills.

How do oilcloth sessions work? A realist evaluation approach to exploring ripple effects in an implementation strategy

“…The implementation object in this study is a new ED at a university hospital in the Capital Region of Denmark. Among other things, the new ED involves physical changes, such as new buildings and changes in the organization involving a merger between two existing EDs in the hospital, the gastroenterological ED and the general ED, which currently handles all other acute admittances including medical diseases and trauma (Stefánsdóttir et al ., 2022).…”

Resistance of Traditional SMEs in Using Digital Payments: Development of Innovation Resistance Theory

“…This research is a qualitative research with a case study approach. This method allows researchers to conduct an in-depth research on the object studied during the interview process [51]. Interviews were conducted with SME traditional clothing markets in Indonesia who already have and use digital payments in their business activities.…”

Addressing Challenges in EMS Department Operations: A Comprehensive Analysis of Key Issues and Solution

“…Stefánsdóttir and team conducted an in-depth study of a specific example of an administrative change: the creation of a new emergency department (ED). Their study, which was conducted at a university hospital in the Capital Region of Denmark, examined how managers and key staff at the ED and specialty departments reacted to and viewed the planned introduction of the new ED [21].…”