Implementing an evidence-based competency model for science team training and evaluation: TeamMAPPS

Bisbey, Tiffany M.; Wooten, Kevin C.; Campo, Maritza Salazar; Lant, Theresa K.; Salas, Eduardo

doi:10.1017/cts.2021.795

Cited by 14 publications

(18 citation statements)

References 44 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…There will be sessions for individual researchers in addition to an option for entire teams. This approach mirrors that of other leading team science training programs (e.g., TeamMAPPS) that provide multiple options for training [20]. Our evaluation instruments will be tailored to these different modalities – individual or team – which will also account for individuals who may not be on a team or may be on multiple teams.…”

Section: Changes To Session Deliverymentioning

confidence: 99%

Developing a Translational Team Training Program using the Wisconsin Interventions in Team Science Framework

Sweeney,

Kelly,

Brasier

et al. 2023

J. Clin. Trans. Sci.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The Clinical and Translational Science Awards (CTSA) Program supports a national network of medical research institutions working to improve the translational process. High-performing translational teams (TTs) are critical for advancing evidence-based approaches that improve human health. When focused on content-appropriate knowledge, skills, and attitudes, targeted training results in the substantial internalization of training content, producing new skills that can be applied to improve team outputs, outcomes, and benefits. More rigorous approaches to develop, test, and evaluate interventions are needed, and we used the Wisconsin Interventions in Team Science framework as a model to systematize our efforts. We designed, built, and tested a five-session TT Training Program for translational researchers. The 90-minute sessions were pilot-tested with 47 postdoctoral fellows and evaluated through a structured evaluation plan. Ninety-five percent of post-session survey respondents indicated that the content and skills provided would make them more effective collaborators, and one hundred percent would recommend the sessions to colleagues. Respondents’ scores increased from pretest to posttest for most learning outcomes. Refinements from participant feedback are described. This work provides a foundation for the continued evolution of evidence-based training programs in the CTSA environment.

show abstract

Section: Changes To Session Deliverymentioning

confidence: 99%

Developing a Translational Team Training Program using the Wisconsin Interventions in Team Science Framework

Sweeney,

Kelly,

Brasier

et al. 2023

J. Clin. Trans. Sci.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…• Translational teams have team science needs that are specific to the characteristics of CTR, including needing techniques to deal with the challenges of increased interdisciplinarity, the engagement of community partners and other lay stakeholders, and the focus on the development of some sort of product (e.g., intervention, drug, device), which often intensifies intellectual property concerns. Furthermore, CTR teams have different needs at different points in that lifecycle, requiring a variety of interventions and ways to understand which interventions work in different contexts [7][8][9]. While most of the interventions described in this issue target early team stages, there is clearly a need for interventions throughout the lifecycle of a translational team.…”

Section: Emerging Themes and Future Research Directionsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…What can an individual, a team, or an institution expect to gain from participating in a given intervention and how will that gain be measured in a rigorous and reproducible way? itself [6,15,16], with others describing the process they used in intervention development in detail [8,13]. The SciTS field needs more rigorous methods for every stage of the intervention development process, but we do not need to start from scratch.…”

Section: Emerging Themes and Future Research Directionsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…• Many, if not most, of the interventions described here require facilitation by team science experts, raising issues of scalability [6,8,14]. The SciTS field remains relatively small, in part because of a lack of explicit training or career paths and in part because of the challenges of funding such positions.…”

Section: Emerging Themes and Future Research Directionsmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Introduction to the themed issue on the design, development, evaluation, and dissemination of team science interventions in clinical and translational research

Rolland

Cross

Hohl

et al. 2021

J. Clin. Trans. Sci.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…To achieve the desired level of team effectiveness, research teams must be proficient in both [ 11 ]. Characteristics of effective teamwork and taskwork components have been obtained from research in teams of different sizes, from small to large, and in a variety of settings (e.g., healthcare, military, industry, academia, research) [ 12 , 13 , 14 , 16 , 17 ]. These studies make it clear that simply using a team-based approach to research projects does not in itself ensure desired results [ 17 ].…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Strategic Team Science Promotes Collaboration and Practice-Based Research at the Research Centers in Minority Institutions

Strekalova

Kornetti

Pemu

et al. 2023

IJERPH

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background. This paper reports on the implementation and evaluation of a strategy to promote collaborations and team science among investigators at the Research Centers in Minority Institutions (RCMI). The strategy presented in this paper was a hands-on workshop that allowed the application of strategic team science through structured dialogue, asset sharing, and systematic exploration of opportunities for collaboration. Methods. The workshop was attended by more than 100 participants, including RCMI and non-RCMI investigators, practice-based research network (PBRN) supplement program directors, and an NIH Institute on Minority Health and Health Disparities Program Officer. Results. A post-workshop survey was administered to collect participant feedback, assess the relevance of the workshop to the participants’ professional development goals, and gauge the applicability of the tool as a support strategy to promote collaborative research. Most of the participants acknowledged that the session met the conference objectives (95.8%), and 93.7% noted that the workshop, to a high degree, met their personal goals and objectives. During the workshop, participants shared 35 resources they were willing and able to offer for prospective collaborative projects. Conclusion. The experience reported and evaluated in this paper paves the way to understanding methods for disseminating effective strategies for inter-institutional collaborations for the sustainable growth and operation of PBRNs.

show abstract

Implementing an evidence-based competency model for science team training and evaluation: TeamMAPPS

Abstract: This version may be subject to change during the production process.

Cited by 14 publications

References 44 publications

Developing a Translational Team Training Program using the Wisconsin Interventions in Team Science Framework

Developing a Translational Team Training Program using the Wisconsin Interventions in Team Science Framework

Introduction to the themed issue on the design, development, evaluation, and dissemination of team science interventions in clinical and translational research

Strategic Team Science Promotes Collaboration and Practice-Based Research at the Research Centers in Minority Institutions

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About