2013
DOI: 10.1177/1748006x13484425
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Implementing dynamic flowgraph methodology models with logic programs

Abstract: The dynamic flowgraph methodology is a promising way to find the prime implicants of a top event for a dynamic system possibly containing digital subsystems. This article demonstrates how to express dynamic flowgraph methodology models as logic programs, and top events as queries to those programs, in a natural and comprehensible way. Computation of the logic program lists the prime implicants of a top event in the system. We also present and implement an algorithm for computing the probability of the top even… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 14 publications
(22 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Some risk-analysis approaches have been introduced to cover the risk contribution of software. Examples are software failure mode and effects analysis (FMEA) [14][15][16][17][18][19][20]), dynamic-flowgraph methodology (DFM) [21][22][23][24], or simulations with failure mode injection [25][26][27]). The current methods make only limited use of available information and the context of use (i.e., the interaction with other software, hardware, or human operators).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some risk-analysis approaches have been introduced to cover the risk contribution of software. Examples are software failure mode and effects analysis (FMEA) [14][15][16][17][18][19][20]), dynamic-flowgraph methodology (DFM) [21][22][23][24], or simulations with failure mode injection [25][26][27]). The current methods make only limited use of available information and the context of use (i.e., the interaction with other software, hardware, or human operators).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%