Implementing high value back pain care in private physiotherapy in Australia: A qualitative evaluation of physiotherapists who participated in an “implementation to innovation” system

Abstract

Objectives: Many barriers exist to delivering high-value care for people with low back pain (LBP). We have developed a multistrategy implementation system to overcome these barriers. Here we describe a qualitative evaluation of the experiences of private-sector physiotherapists implementing the system. Design: PRISM (Practice-based innovation and implementation system) is an iterative clinicianas-scientist implementation program, tailored here for acute and subacute LBP. PRISM integrates strategies from behavioral change, implementation, and educational science fields. Semistructured interviews, group discussion forums, and electronic questionnaires were used to collect data at multiple time points that were then analyzed using an interpretative descriptive approach. Participants: Six physiotherapists (purposive sample) practicing in private practice physiotherapy clinics in the Adelaide region, South Australia, were enrolled in the study. Interventions: Interventions included an educational pain science and care workshop incorporating self-regulated learning principles, a co-planned clinical pathway, an electronic decision support tool, development and support of a community of practice, case study simulations, audit and feedback, and collaborative problem solving and innovation for physiotherapists. Results: Participants' experiences and perceptions centered around five themes: (1) knowledge and skills training; (2) networking and mentoring; (3) a clear clinical pathway; (4) practical tools; and (5) data feedback. Participants appraised the implementation process positively but identified patient receptiveness as a challenge at times. Suggestions for improvement included streamlining/automating data collection forms and processes and providing more simulation opportunities. Conclusions: PRISM appears to be a promising approach to overcoming several barriers that prevent people with back pain from receiving high-value care. It consolidates and increases pain science knowledge and increases physiotherapist confidence in delivering high-value care. It appears to legitimize some current practices, enhance clinical reasoning and communication skills, extend knowledge in line with contemporary pain science, and facilitate the application of a biopsychosocial management approach. The high-level acceptance by participants provides a foundation for further research to test outcomes and delivery in different settings. Contribution of the article • A quality improvement intervention designed to improve delivery of high-value care was well received by private practice physiotherapists. • Physiotherapists particularly valued using experiential learning to improve fluency in communicating with, and educating patients about, contemporary pain science. • A structured clinical pathway and tools guided physiotherapists on the basic elements of necessary care and allowed them to concentrate on higher levels of decision making and communication with patients. RÉSUMÉ Objectifs: Il existe de nombreux obstacles à la prestation de soi...

What does high value care for musculoskeletal conditions mean and how do you apply it in practice? A consensus statement from a research network of physiotherapists in New South Wales, Australia

“…Most (62%) sources provided high level conceptual guidance on high value care for health systems 11–16 20–25 47–57. Only seven sources (18%) provided recommendations for individual clinicians to assist in high value care application 19 28 29 53 58–61. Only one source (3%) involved care providers in developing clinical recommendations for osteoarthritis consultations 60…”

“…There is no consensus on the definition of high value musculoskeletal care for physiotherapists. Where literature is specific to physiotherapy, terms like high-quality care or evidence-based care are often conflated or used synonymously with high value care 13 17 18 27–29. Without input from clinicians about high value care and how it applies to practice, definitions may lack clinically applicable information and any intended impact on care delivery is unlikely to be realised.…”

Service utilisation trends in the manual therapy professions within the Australian private healthcare setting between 2008 and 2017

“…This would mirror observations from North America that suggest the chiropractic profession has been in oversupply since the turn of the century [ 38 , 39 ]. Alternatively, perhaps the phenomenon of high-volume, low-value service provision, which subsists among a subset of the chiropractic profession [ 40 – 42 ], is becoming less sustainable as higher value models of care become more available external to the chiropractic profession [ 43 , 44 ].…”

The perceptions of individuals with musculoskeletal disorders towards prognosis: An exploratory qualitative study

“…In the provision of healthcare, prognosis refers to the risk of future health outcomes in people with a given disease or health condition (Hemingway et al., 2013). Prognosis is widely recognised by healthcare professionals as being an important and integral component in the management of MSDs (Ahern et al., 2020; Gardner, Moseley, et al., 2020). Furthermore, in physiotherapy, prognosis is one hypothesis category that is recommended for both clinicians and patients to consider in the management of MSDs (Jones & Rivett, 2003).…”

“…Furthermore, in physiotherapy, prognosis is one hypothesis category that is recommended for both clinicians and patients to consider in the management of MSDs (Jones & Rivett, 2003). The potential benefits of using prognostic information in the management of MSDs includes improving treatment selection and response (Almeida et al., 2018; Hill et al., 2011; Lentz et al., 2020; Price et al., 2014; Sheeran et al., 2015), empowering and educating patients (Lin et al., 2020), identifying the need for further investigation or treatment escalation (Gardner, Moseley, et al., 2020), and improving patient flow and access to care through risk stratification (Foster et al., 2012; Lewis et al., 2018).…”