2015
DOI: 10.1007/s10956-015-9573-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Implementing Innovative Technologies Through Lesson Plans: What Kind of Support Do Teachers Prefer?

Abstract: Lesson plans are a potentially powerful means to facilitate teachers' use of technology in the classroom. This study investigated which supplementary information is preferred by teachers when integrating a new technology into the classroom. Forty-six high school biology teachers (23 pre-service and 23 in-service) received a technologyinfused lesson plan and were asked to choose between two sets of support materials that differed with regard to the extensiveness and integration of pedagogical and content inform… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
16
0
6

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
(38 reference statements)
1
16
0
6
Order By: Relevance
“…For the devices to be implemented and used effectively (i.e., in the way that they were designed, not as a tool substitute), the teachers considered they needed to understand the possibilities of using them in the classroom prior to the planning process commencing. Teachers' practices were impacted by a range of challenges also identified in the literature, including technical issues (Lai, 2005;Minshew & Anderson, 2015), lack of time (Janssen & Lazonder, 2015) and limited professional learning opportunities (Davis et al, 2013;Ling Koh et al, 2014). All three teachers believed they needed to increase both their technological, and technological pedagogical content knowledge, to be able to implement BYOD to full effect in their classrooms.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For the devices to be implemented and used effectively (i.e., in the way that they were designed, not as a tool substitute), the teachers considered they needed to understand the possibilities of using them in the classroom prior to the planning process commencing. Teachers' practices were impacted by a range of challenges also identified in the literature, including technical issues (Lai, 2005;Minshew & Anderson, 2015), lack of time (Janssen & Lazonder, 2015) and limited professional learning opportunities (Davis et al, 2013;Ling Koh et al, 2014). All three teachers believed they needed to increase both their technological, and technological pedagogical content knowledge, to be able to implement BYOD to full effect in their classrooms.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…These challenges include technical issues (Lai, 2005, Minshew & Anderson, 2015, lack of time (Janssen & Lazonder, 2015) and limited professional learning opportunities (Davis, Eickelmann, & Zaka, 2013;Ling Koh, Chai, & Tay, 2014). Teachers require access to professional learning that builds confidence and develops the technological knowledge and skills to enable them to overcome these challenges when introducing BYOD (Minshew & Anderson, 2015;Starkey, 2010).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Bu özellik sayesinde PAB bir öğretmenin, konu alanındaki uzmandan ayrılmasını sağlar (Shulman, 1987). Bir öğretmenin sahip olması gereken bilgi Shulman'dan (1987) Literatür incelendiğinde öğretmen adaylarının TPAB'ı üzerinde yapılan çalışmalar (Ayvaz, 2019;Bulut, 2012;Canbolat, 2011;Gündüz, 2018;Janssen & Lazonder, 2015;Kabakçı, 2011, Karakaya, 2012Kaya, 2010;Keser, Karaoğlan Yılmaz ve Yılmaz, 2015;Kılıç, 2011;Kılıç, 2015;Kocakaya, 2015;Öztürk, 2013;Sancar Tokmak, Yavuz Konakman ve Yanpar Yelken, 2012;Savaş, 2011), öğretmenlerin TPAB'ları üzerinde yapılan çalışmalar (Ay, 2015;Archambault & Crippen, 2009;Kılıçkeser, 2019), öğretim elemanlarının TPAB'ları üzerinde yapılan çalışmalar (Şimşek, Demir, Bağçeci ve Kinay, 2013) ve deneysel uygulamaların TPAB gelişimi üzerindeki etkisine yönelik çalışmalar (Baran, Canbazoğlu Bilici, Albayrak Sarı ve Tondeur, 2019;Canbazoğlu Bilici ve Baran, 2015;Chai, Koh & Tsai, 2010;Çelik, Hebebci ve Şahin, 2014;Ersoy, Yurdakul ve Ceylan, 2016;Guzey & Roehrig, 2009;Harris & Hofer, 2011;Jaipal Jamani at al., 2018;Jimoyiannis, 2010;Koh & Chai, 2014;Kurt, 2016;Liu, 2013;Maeng, Mulvey, Smetana & Bell, 2013;Niess, 2005;Sheffield, Dobozy, Gibson, Mullaney & Campbell, 2015) göze çarpmaktadır. Yukarıda örnek olarak verilen çalışmalar ve literatürdeki diğer çalışmalar incelendiğinde ağır...…”
Section: Necatibey Eğitim Fakültesi Elektronik Fen Ve Matematik Eğitiunclassified
“…Recent research has explored the connection between teachers' technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK; Mishra & Koehler, 2006) and lesson planning (Janssen & Lazonder, 2015;Pringle, Dawson & Ritzhaupt, 2015). However, no studies have investigated teachers' use of TPACK as they are planning the lesson, instead the focus has been on written lesson plans or lesson selection.…”
Section: Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledgementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Teachers' lesson plans are of particular interest, as they directly relate to the cognitive processes teachers use when planning and reflect important aspects of the systems of knowledge they use when planning (Jacobs, 2008;Janssen & Lazonder, 2015). Multiple approaches have been used to explore the specific planning process of teachers.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%