Implementing international sexual counselling guidelines in hospital cardiac rehabilitation: development of the CHARMS intervention using the Behaviour Change Wheel

Abstract

BackgroundDecreased sexual activity and sexual problems are common among people with cardiovascular disease, negatively impacting relationship satisfaction and quality of life. International guidelines recommend routine delivery of sexual counselling to cardiac patients. The Cardiac Health and Relationship Management and Sexuality (CHARMS) baseline study in Ireland found, similar to international findings, limited implementation of sexual counselling guidelines in practice. The aim of the current study was to develop the CHARMS multi-level intervention to increase delivery of sexual counselling by healthcare professionals. We describe the methods used to develop the CHARMS intervention following the three phases of the Behaviour Change Wheel approach: understand the behaviour, identify intervention options, and identify content and implementation options. Survey (n = 60) and focus group (n = 14) data from two previous studies exploring why sexual counselling is not currently being delivered were coded by two members of the research team to understand staff’s capability, opportunity, and motivation to engage in the behaviour. All potentially relevant intervention functions to change behaviour were identified and the APEASE (affordability, practicability, effectiveness, acceptability, side effects and equity) criteria were used to select the most appropriate. The APEASE criteria were then used to choose between all behaviour change techniques (BCTs) potentially relevant to the identified functions, and these BCTs were translated into intervention content. The Template for Intervention Description and Replication (TIDieR) checklist was used to specify details of the intervention including the who, what, how and where of proposed intervention delivery.ResultsProviding sexual counselling group sessions by cardiac rehabilitation staff to patients during phase III cardiac rehabilitation was identified as the target behaviour. Education, enablement, modelling, persuasion and training were selected as appropriate intervention functions. Twelve BCTs, linked to intervention functions, were identified for inclusion and translated into CHARMS intervention content.ConclusionsThis paper details the use of Behaviour Change Wheel approach to develop an implementation intervention in an under-researched area of healthcare provision. The systematic and transparent development of the CHARMS intervention will facilitate the evaluation of intervention effectiveness and future replication and contribute to the advancement of a cumulative science of implementation intervention design.Electronic supplementary materialThe online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s13012-016-0493-4) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

The Acute Aphasia IMplementation Study (AAIMS): a pilot cluster randomized controlled trial

“…); it has been used to design successful behaviour change interventions (e.g., McSharry et al . ). The previously identified barriers for both practice behaviours, in addition to examples of these barriers, are presented in table .…”

Strengthening the role and functions of nursing staff in inpatient stroke rehabilitation: developing a complex intervention using the Behaviour Change Wheel

“…In previous research using the BCW framework, researchers also used interviews, field observation and/or questionnaires to identify factors that need to change in order for the desired behaviour to occur (Mc Sharry, Murphy, & Byrne, 2016;Steinmo, Fuller, Stone, & Michie, 2015). In our study, we supplemented this approach, as recommended in the MRC, with knowledge from systematic reviews.…”

A collaborative approach to developing sustainable behaviour change interventions for childhood obesity prevention: Development of the Choosing Healthy Eating for Infant Health (CHErIsH) intervention and implementation strategy

“…Use of the BCW also enabled us to make the programme theory underlying both aspects of our intervention explicit, by facilitating our development of a logic model linking specific intervention components to study outcomes, via the intended mechanisms of change. While several other implementation frameworks or models could have used to develop the HCP‐level implementation strategy (Nilsen, ), the BCW was specifically developed to improve the design and implementation of evidence‐based practice (Michie et al , ) and has previously been used to develop implementation strategies to support the delivery of patient‐level interventions (Gould et al , ; Mc Sharry, Murphy, & Byrne, ; Sinnott et al , ). However, examples of studies that have used the Behaviour Change Wheel approach with this amount of evidence sources from such varied perspectives are rare; our study showcases the transparent and systematic development of a thorough and extremely comprehensive evidence‐based intervention and associated implementation strategy.…”