2012
DOI: 10.1080/08832323.2011.593588
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Implementing Mission-Driven Assurance of Learning: Improving Performance Through Constructive Collaboration

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Betters-Reed, Nitkin and Sampson ( 2008) also see assurance of learning as a change management concept and situates it in the change management literature. The associated motivations for, costs of or resistance to assurance of learning are well-documented in the literature (for example, see Eschenfelder, Bryan & Lee, 2014;Marques & Garrett, 2012) but are not the focus of this study.…”
Section: Assurance Of Learning and 'Closing The Loop'mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Betters-Reed, Nitkin and Sampson ( 2008) also see assurance of learning as a change management concept and situates it in the change management literature. The associated motivations for, costs of or resistance to assurance of learning are well-documented in the literature (for example, see Eschenfelder, Bryan & Lee, 2014;Marques & Garrett, 2012) but are not the focus of this study.…”
Section: Assurance Of Learning and 'Closing The Loop'mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The first is the philosophical discussion of the potential positive and negative impacts of the AoL standards on universities, departments, professors, students, and other constituents. Marques and Garrett (2012) provided a brief evaluation on the ongoing debate about the pros/cons of AACSB AoL procedures. While, transparency, consistency and increased faculty cooperation are often cited as the advantages of the AoL, there are concerns related to the increasing reliance on quantitative measurements and standardized assessment tools.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%