2011 Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE) 2011
DOI: 10.1109/fie.2011.6142886
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Implementing nanotechnology education in the high school classroom

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…They found that it was possible to introduce nanoscience concepts at the high school level to engage and motivate students; however, they also found that many concepts were too difficult and students did not have the background to fully understand the complex nanoscience ideas [4]. In a different study of high school nanoscience, Pelleg et al [5] reported that being introduced to nanoscience at a young age can change students' perceptions of nanoscience in a positive way and increase interest in a new field.…”
Section: Background Literature: Nanoscience and Technology In 21st Cementioning
confidence: 99%
“…They found that it was possible to introduce nanoscience concepts at the high school level to engage and motivate students; however, they also found that many concepts were too difficult and students did not have the background to fully understand the complex nanoscience ideas [4]. In a different study of high school nanoscience, Pelleg et al [5] reported that being introduced to nanoscience at a young age can change students' perceptions of nanoscience in a positive way and increase interest in a new field.…”
Section: Background Literature: Nanoscience and Technology In 21st Cementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other qualitative questions used free word association [44]- [46] as an indicator of students' attitudes toward, and perceptions of, careers in computer science and computing in general. This approach generates spontaneous responses that may not be elicited from more structured interviews or questionnaires.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other studies commonly mentioned small sample sizes which limit the generalization of their findings. Pelleg et al (2011) introduced the nanotechnology module to only students from science and engineering magnet schools rather than typical high schools hence the results from his findings cannot be generalized to other types of school students. Meanwhile, Mandrikas et al (2020) had only implemented their TLS in small exposure and presented by the researcher themselves rather than teachers of the schools which can risk biases.…”
Section: Study Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 99%