2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.forpol.2016.01.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Implementing REDD+ at the national level: Stakeholder engagement and policy coherences between REDD+ rules and Kenya's sectoral policies

Abstract: Effective implementation of rules on reduced emission from avoided deforestation and forest degradation (REDD+) depends on the compatibility between these rules and existing sectoral policies associated with forests. This paper applies content analysis of policy documents, semi-structured interviews and case study analysis to examine the interplay between REDD+ rules and Kenyan sectorial policies and local socioeconomic

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
39
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 46 publications
(39 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
39
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Research on policy integration has mostly been devoted to assessing the extent of integration of international agreements into national policies (Stringer et al, 2009;Nilsson et al, 2012;England, Stringer, Dougill, & Afionis, 2018;Atela, Quinn, Minang, Duguma, & Houdet, 2016), while globally, integration of sectoral and departmental policies remains a common challenge (Oberthur, 2009). There is a critical lack of knowledge on the integration of agricultural considerations and issues at sectoral/sub-sectoral levels (Gomar, Stringer, & Paavola, 2014).…”
Section: Theoretical Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Research on policy integration has mostly been devoted to assessing the extent of integration of international agreements into national policies (Stringer et al, 2009;Nilsson et al, 2012;England, Stringer, Dougill, & Afionis, 2018;Atela, Quinn, Minang, Duguma, & Houdet, 2016), while globally, integration of sectoral and departmental policies remains a common challenge (Oberthur, 2009). There is a critical lack of knowledge on the integration of agricultural considerations and issues at sectoral/sub-sectoral levels (Gomar, Stringer, & Paavola, 2014).…”
Section: Theoretical Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…at national, sectoral or departmental level) may be either reinforced or undermined by other policies, producing either mutually-supporting or adverse outcomes (Dixon & Stringer, 2015;Lasco, Cruz, R. Pulhin, & J. Puhlin 2006;Soderberg, 2008). Coherence has become a crucial variable in policy analysis considering its importance in determining policy effectiveness (Atela et al, 2016). As national implementation arrangements often involve multiple sectors and stakeholders (Chandra & Idrisova, 2011), outcomes of one policy (e.g.…”
Section: Theoretical Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The influx of capital from the private sector and other governments flows into the newly created bureaucratic structures for managing climate finance in fragile host governments [44,45]. The emerging effects of this are ministries competing for environmental funding sources [46] and continued forest loss. The logics of a market economy seem to be unequal to the challenges of deforestation and of mitigating its climate changing effects.…”
Section: Forest-centered Ccm: Redd+ and Forest Plantationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, examination of existing REDD+ development at national scales has revealed major challenges in coordination across sectors already, with both duplications and gaps in how REDD+ works with other development policies [39][40][41]. Additionally, there are often mismatches between time scales for projects, with mitigation usually being more immediate and adaptation more longer term [19].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%