2007
DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.652744
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Implementing Relevant Market Tests in Antitrust Policy: Application to Computer Servers

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
14
0
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
14
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This structural model allows for the exact implementation of the thought experiment prescribed by the merger guidelines' SSNIP test. The use of such models has been promoted in the past decade as a theoretically superior approach to merger analysis in differentiated product industries, (e.g., Nevo []; Motta []; Baker []; Geroski and Griffith []; Van Reenen []; Ivaldi and Lőrincz []) however, such an approach has not been commonly employed in antitrust analysis, and thus little is known about the differences in markets produced by these methods relative to the methods used in actual merger cases…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This structural model allows for the exact implementation of the thought experiment prescribed by the merger guidelines' SSNIP test. The use of such models has been promoted in the past decade as a theoretically superior approach to merger analysis in differentiated product industries, (e.g., Nevo []; Motta []; Baker []; Geroski and Griffith []; Van Reenen []; Ivaldi and Lőrincz []) however, such an approach has not been commonly employed in antitrust analysis, and thus little is known about the differences in markets produced by these methods relative to the methods used in actual merger cases…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In literature, the number of studies which utilize both demand estimation and simulation techniques to delineate the relevant market is rather limited: The most important study in this area is Ivaldi and Lörincz (2011) which proposed the name of the Full Equilibrium Relevant Market (FERM) Test. 10 Ivaldi and Lörincz (2011) applied SSNIP and FERM tests to the industry of computer servers.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In practice, relevant market definitions are not implemented formally, they are used only as a framework of thinking about the problem. The proper application of tests might result in more fragmentation in the market structure found (Ivaldi and Lörincz 2011). To be more precise, it should be expected that under FERM there is a tendency to get narrower markets than under SSNIP.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The complete hybrid shows a price fall of 30% per annum for work group servers compared to 20% per annum for high-end enterprise servers. 18 This is suggestive (although hardly conclusive) of different market segments for low-end and highend servers; see e.g., Ivaldi and Lorinz (2004) or Van Reenen (2004) for more on market definition.…”
Section: F40mentioning
confidence: 99%