2021
DOI: 10.1186/s12903-021-01747-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Implementing the Smile4life intervention for people experiencing homelessness: a path analytical evaluation

Abstract: Background People experiencing homelessness have high levels of dental decay, oral cancer and poor oral health-related quality of life. The Scottish Government sought to address these issues by developing a national oral health improvement programme for people experiencing homelessness, named Smile4life. The aim was to investigate implementation behaviours and the role of work-related beliefs upon the delivery of the Smile4life programme across NHS Board areas in Scotland. … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“… 25 28 32 40 41 The risk of bias was assessed for the five articles reporting quantitative findings; among the two RCTs, one had a high risk of bias because of attrition and reporting bias, 34 and the other article had a low risk of bias, 35 the remaining three cross-sectional studies were of moderate quality. 27 30 39 The findings reported in this review are mostly from high or moderate quality articles, with the inclusion of insights from low quality articles employed strategically for completeness of reporting evidence available and to supplement findings from the adequately reported articles.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… 25 28 32 40 41 The risk of bias was assessed for the five articles reporting quantitative findings; among the two RCTs, one had a high risk of bias because of attrition and reporting bias, 34 and the other article had a low risk of bias, 35 the remaining three cross-sectional studies were of moderate quality. 27 30 39 The findings reported in this review are mostly from high or moderate quality articles, with the inclusion of insights from low quality articles employed strategically for completeness of reporting evidence available and to supplement findings from the adequately reported articles.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although we found a high demand from people experiencing homelessness for a community dental service, the problems with financial, material and human resources and administrative and legislation problems were the barriers to continuing and sustaining providing the service. Evidence suggests that collaboration with key stakeholders and endusers, including co-design of the services with homeless people; multidisciplinary working with homeless support organizations, dental practitioners, and educational institutions; and public funding are crucial to enhance the acceptability, feasibility and sustainability of community-based dental services [10,11,14,28]. Moreover, based on the evidence, the community-based participatory approach in research is important not only to increase the likelihood of community-based intervention success but also to eliminate oral health disparities [29,30].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Emergency care is the only care most people experiencing homelessness in Slovakia are eligible to receive because of having debts on health insurance payments [13]. The evidence shows that community-based oral health interventions are crucial for improving the access of homeless people to dental care [10,11,[14][15][16][17]; however, such services have not been developed in Slovakia yet. The only community-based dental clinic providing emergency dental care for people experiencing homelessness was open from 2012 until 2018 in Bratislava.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Bringing an intersectionality approach to oral health recognizes relations of power, inequity, oppression, and social exclusion when addressing the hard-to-resolve problem of poor oral health in older adults (Yuval-Davis 2016; Beaton et al 2020). There has been limited application of intersectionality in oral health research.…”
Section: Intersectionality Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In 2 studies, Schuch et al (2021) and Jamieson et al (2023) considered intersectionality in relation to racial discrimination and oral health in Australia in their quantitative analysis. Recent literature suggests substantial potential using intersectionality in research related to aging and oral health (Cuesta and Rämgård 2016; Beaton et al 2020; Muirhead et al 2020; Macdonald et al 2022; Ramos-Gomez and Kinsler 2022). This approach has the potential to highlight social injustice and build capacity in oral health care providers to improve oral health outcomes in adults across all social indices (Rosenthal 2016).…”
Section: Intersectionality Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%