Implementing traumatic brain injury screening in behavioral health treatment settings: results of an explanatory sequential mixed-methods investigation

Abstract

Background Traumatic brain injury (TBI) is a complex condition common among individuals treated in behavioral healthcare, but TBI screening has not been adopted in these settings which can affect optimal clinical decision-making. Integrating evidence-based practices that address complex health comorbidities into behavioral healthcare settings remains understudied in implementation science, limited by few studies using theory-driven hypotheses to disentangle relationships between proximal and medial indicators on distal implementation outcomes. Grounded in the Theory of Planned Behavior, we examined providers’ attitudes, perceived behavioral control (PBC), subjective norms, and intentions to adopt The Ohio State University TBI Identification Method (OSU TBI-ID) in behavioral healthcare settings. Methods We used an explanatory sequential mixed-methods design. In Phase I, 215 providers from 25 organizations in the USA completed training introducing the OSU TBI-ID, followed by a survey assessing attitudes, PBC, norms, and intentions to screen for TBI. After 1 month, providers completed another survey assessing the number of TBI screens conducted. Data were analyzed using structural equation modeling (SEM) with logistic regressions. In Phase II, 20 providers were purposively selected for semi-structured interviews to expand on SEM results. Qualitative data were analyzed using thematic analysis, integrated with quantitative results, and combined into joint displays. Results Only 25% (55/215) of providers adopted TBI screening, which was driven by motivations to trial the intervention. Providers who reported more favorable attitudes (OR: 0.67, p < .001) and greater subjective norms (OR: 0.12, p < .001) toward TBI screening demonstrated increased odds of intention to screen, which resulted in greater TBI screening adoption (OR: 0.30; p < .01). PBC did not affect intentions or adoption. Providers explained that although TBI screening can improve diagnostic and clinical decision-making, they discussed that additional training, leadership engagement, and state-level mandates are needed to increase the widespread, systematic uptake of TBI screening. Conclusions This study advances implementation science by using theory-driven hypothesis testing to disentangle proximal and medial indicators at the provider level on TBI screening adoption. Our mixed-methods approach added in-depth contextualization and illuminated additional multilevel determinants affecting intervention adoption, which guides a more precise selection of implementation strategies.

Implementation of activities of daily living retraining for individuals in post-traumatic amnesia

“…However, the fact that recent clinical practice guidelines have recommended the use of ADL retraining in PTA (Ponsford et al 2023) will hopefully promote change and willingness of hospitals to invest resources in this practice. Inner and outer setting factors will need to be addressed along with provision of accessible training to promote behaviour change (Ritchie et al 2017;Hyzak et al 2023).…”

Processes for identifying and managing traumatic brain injury in the justice sector

“…from other difficulties that an individual may be experiencing, such as trauma, drug and alcohol, or mental health difficulties. Previous evidence from outside the justice sector has revealed practitioners find knowing a person's history of TBI assists with making differential diagnoses and considering whether the difficulties a person may be experiencing are due to mental health, addiction or TBI (Hyzak et al 2023). This reinforces the complex healthcare needs of people within the justice sector, which may be better addressed by the nature of their impact rather than cause (Butler et al 2022).…”