2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.exppara.2013.04.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Implication of CA repeated tracts on post-transcriptional regulation in Trypanosoma cruzi

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 54 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Several studies demonstrated the presence of U-rich elements in trypanosomal mRNA 3′-UTRs [reviewed in Araujo & Teixeira, 2011; Haile & Papadopoulou, 2007; Hendriks & Matthews, 2007]. Strikingly, the functional role of CA repeated tracts in T. cruzi 3′-UTRs was recently established as a signal for gene expression modulation through the parasite’s life-cycle (Pastro et al, 2013). …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several studies demonstrated the presence of U-rich elements in trypanosomal mRNA 3′-UTRs [reviewed in Araujo & Teixeira, 2011; Haile & Papadopoulou, 2007; Hendriks & Matthews, 2007]. Strikingly, the functional role of CA repeated tracts in T. cruzi 3′-UTRs was recently established as a signal for gene expression modulation through the parasite’s life-cycle (Pastro et al, 2013). …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is possible that most of the trypanosomatid non‐coding (often repetitive) regions have a structural function or regulate gene expression, proliferation and/or differentiation at various morphological stages in different hosts (see e.g. Araújo & Teixeira, ; Pastro et al, ). Since this non‐coding DNA is functional, it is unlikely to be found in condensed chromosome regions.…”
Section: Euglenozoan Nuclear Genomesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Trypanosomatids are capable of assuming multiple developmental forms and transition between forms coincides with passing between distinct environments, whether they are in different hosts or a single host, for example from the hindgut to the foregut of an insect. Experimental approaches are beginning to reveal the non-coding sequences (Bringaud et al 2007 ; Holzer et al 2008 ; Smith et al 2009 ; Li et al 2012 ; Pastro et al 2013 ) and RNA-binding proteins (reviewed in Kolev et al 2014 ) that interact to regulate gene expression, as well as genes specifically required for differentiation from one life stage to another (Goldenberg and Avila, 2011 ; Kolev et al 2012 ; Rico et al 2013 ). Comparison of life-stage-specific transcriptomes (Holzer et al 2006 ; Leifso et al 2007 ; Saxena et al 2007 ; Rochette et al 2008 , 2009 ; Alcolea et al 2009 , 2010 ; Depledge et al 2009 ; Jensen et al 2009 ; Kabani et al 2009 ; Minning et al 2009 ; Veitch et al 2010 ; Adaui et al 2011 ;) and proteomes (Atwood et al 2005 ; Rosenzweig et al 2008 a , b ; Alcolea et al 2011 ; Urbaniak et al 2012 ; Gunasekera et al 2012 ; Butter et al 2013 ) in various species have estimated the proportion of genes showing preferential expression in the insect or vertebrate stages to be between 2 and 44%; the breadth of these values reflects the diverse conditions and approaches employed.…”
Section: Developmental Regulation Of Gene Expressionmentioning
confidence: 99%