Implication of d-dimer in rheumatic severe mitral stenosis – A tertiary centre study

Abstract

Background In rheumatic mitral stenosis (MS), left atrial (LA) thrombus and LA spontaneous echo contrast (LA SEC) reflect hypercoagulability. The study focuses on whether D-dimer levels predict the existence of LA thrombus and SEC in patients with severe MS. Methods 95 consecutive patients with severe MS referred for transesophageal echocardiogram (TEE) between July 2011 and March 2012 to evaluate LA thrombus prior to balloon mitral valvotomy (BMV) were included in the study. D-Dimer levels in these patients were observed. Results Out of the 95 patients, 15 (15.8%) had LA thrombus and 52 patients had LA SEC (54.7%). Any correlation between D-Dimer levels and existence (or non-existence) of LA thrombus was not noticed from the receiver operating characteristics (ROC) curve with an area of .535. For patients with LA SEC, the D-Dimer levels were found to be considerably higher (776 ± 866 μg/L vs. 294 ± 331 μg/L, p = .001). An ideal cut-off level of 393 μg/L for diagnosing LA SEC was illustrated by the ROC curve with a sensitivity of 63.4%, specificity of 83.72%, positive predictive value of 82.5% and a negative predictive value of 65.45%. Conclusions D-dimer levels were not representative of the presence or absence of LA thrombus in patients with severe MS. Nonetheless, this study demonstrated the substantial link between D-Dimer level and LA SEC. If a D-Dimer level of 400 μg/L or higher is taken as positive, it has high specificity and positive predictive value for diagnosing LA SEC.

Predictive Value of D-dimer Levels for Detection of Left Atrial Thrombus in Patients with Rheumatic Severe Mitral Stenosis

“…This finding is similar to that of Sukulal et al, (2020), which showed there is significant association of AF with LA thrombus. 10 Among other clinical parameters, NYHA class was higher in group I than group II. Majority of patients of group I were in NYHA class III (64%), while majority were in NYHA class II (56%) in group II, this was statistically significant (p<0.05).…”