Implication of electromagnetohydrodynamic flow of a non‐Newtonian hybrid nanofluid in a converging and diverging channel with velocity slip effects: A comparative investigation using numerical and ADM approaches

Abstract

This study delves into the intricate interplay of magnetic and electric fields (EMHD) on the flow characteristics of a non‐Newtonian bio‐hybrid nanofluid, consisting of Ag+Graphene/blood, within converging and diverging geometries. The investigation takes into account the effects of velocity slip at the walls, offering a comprehensive examination of this complex fluid system. A novel bio‐hybrid nanofluid model was introduced, featuring a unique combination of Ag+Graphene/blood nanoparticles. To address this multifaceted problem, the research employed mathematical modeling based on nonlinear partial differential equations (PDEs), encompassing continuity and momentum equations. These PDEs were then transformed into a system of nonlinear ordinary differential equations (ODEs) through similarity transformations. The study explored both numerical and analytical solutions, with a particular focus on the application of the Adomian decomposition method (ADM). To validate the findings, the study compared the analytical results with those obtained using the HAM‐based Mathematica package and the Runge–Kutta Fehlberg 4th–5th order (RKF‐45) method in specific scenarios. Active parameters, including nanofluid volume fraction, slip factors, and the influence of magnetic and electric fields, were systematically examined to unveil their impacts on velocity and skin friction within this multifaceted nanofluid system. It is found that the skin friction coefficient decreases with the Increasing both the nanoparticle volume fraction, Hartmann number and the angle in both channels. Results obtained also reveal an in the converging section, higher Casson parameters lead to increased yield stress but are offset by the higher shear rates, resulting in a higher velocity profile. In the diverging section, the fluid resists flow due to the reduced shear stress, leading to a decreased velocity profile.