2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.marpetgeo.2020.104590
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Implications for controls on Upper Cambrian microbial build-ups across multiple-scales, Mason County, Central Texas, USA

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
15
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
1
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Step 5: We spatially registered artificial outcrop photos generated from step 4B using the trace header of the AI section and treated them as geospatially aware outcrop photos. We constructed the virtual outcrop model from these imageries using a similar method to construct the digital outcrop model (Menegoni et al 2019;Khanna et al 2020;Thomas et al 2020). We then exported the model as cloud points that contain the spatial location (x, y, z) and RGB channel of each point (Figure 7).…”
Section: 4detailed Methodology Implementationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Step 5: We spatially registered artificial outcrop photos generated from step 4B using the trace header of the AI section and treated them as geospatially aware outcrop photos. We constructed the virtual outcrop model from these imageries using a similar method to construct the digital outcrop model (Menegoni et al 2019;Khanna et al 2020;Thomas et al 2020). We then exported the model as cloud points that contain the spatial location (x, y, z) and RGB channel of each point (Figure 7).…”
Section: 4detailed Methodology Implementationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Drone and measured sections are utilized for continuous outcrop facies mapping, while geophysics and core data extend the facies mapping into the three dimensions behind the outcrop. model (DOM) using Pix4D® software, following the method reported in Khanna et al (2020) and Menegoni et al (2019). For data interpretation and further analysis, we imported the DOM into VRGS software®.…”
Section: Field Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ripley's K analysis (Ripley, 1981;Dixon, 2002) is a spatial statistic method commonly applied to investigate the clustering tendencies of spatially distributed point features. The method examines how the distribution of points changes with distance by comparing points located inside the circles of variable radius (centered at each data point) with points from a completely random distribution (Khanna et al, 2020). This method was utilized in outcrop studies such as by Khanna et al (2020) and Jacquemyn et al (2018) to investigate the clustering tendencies of microbial buildups and rudstone-filled scoured channels.…”
Section: Ripley's K Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Ripley's K analysis (Ripley, 1981;Dixon, 2002) is a spatial statistic method commonly applied to investigate the clustering tendencies of spatially distributed point features. The method examines how the distribution of points changes with distance by comparing points located inside the circles of variable radius (centered at each data point) with points from a completely random distribution (Khanna et al, 2020). This method was utilized in outcrop studies such as by Khanna et al (2020) and Jacquemyn et al (2018) to investigate the clustering tendencies of microbial buildups and rudstone-filled scoured channels.…”
Section: Ripley's K Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%