2020
DOI: 10.1088/1475-7516/2020/06/045
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Implications for cosmology from ground-based Cosmic Microwave Background observations

Abstract: Cosmic Microwave Background (CMB) anisotropy encodes a lot of information about our Universe. In this paper we take the ground-based CMB observations (GCMB), including the South Pole Telescope (SPT), SPTpol and the Atacama Cosmology Telescope Polarimeter (ACTPol), as a new probe to the CMB anisotropy independent of two satellite observations, i.e. Wilkinson Microwave Anisotropy Probe (WMAP) and Planck. The combination of current GCMB data is consistent with WMAP and Planck. In the spatially flat ΛCDM model, th… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 63 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The scenario described by the action in equation (102) with F(σ) = 1 + ξσ 2 and with the potential V(σ) = λσ 4 /4 (λ is a free parameter) has been recently studied in reference [859], where it has been named 'early modified gravity model'. 27 For this model, the combination of the Planck 2018 + BAO + FS + Pantheon + R19 + H0LiCOW datasets gives H 0 = 71.00 +0. 87 −0.79 km s −1 Mpc −1 at 68% CL [859], reducing the Hubble tension at 1.4σ with R20.…”
Section: F(q) Gravity Theorymentioning
confidence: 98%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The scenario described by the action in equation (102) with F(σ) = 1 + ξσ 2 and with the potential V(σ) = λσ 4 /4 (λ is a free parameter) has been recently studied in reference [859], where it has been named 'early modified gravity model'. 27 For this model, the combination of the Planck 2018 + BAO + FS + Pantheon + R19 + H0LiCOW datasets gives H 0 = 71.00 +0. 87 −0.79 km s −1 Mpc −1 at 68% CL [859], reducing the Hubble tension at 1.4σ with R20.…”
Section: F(q) Gravity Theorymentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Indeed, the combination of ACT (from = 600 in TT and = 350 in TE/EE) and WMAP data, with a Gaussian prior on τ instead of the low-polarization likelihood, results in H 0 = 67.6 ± 1.1 km s −1 Mpc −1 at 68% CL [26], always assuming a ΛCDM model, or H 0 = 67.9 ± 1.5 km s −1 Mpc −1 at 68% CL for ACT alone. Finally, a combination of ground based CMB experiments SPT, SPTPol, and the Atacama Cosmology Telescope polarimeter (ACTPol) gives H 0 = 69.72 ± 1.63 km s −1 Mpc −1 at 68% CL [27], while SPTPol + ACTPol, when combined with the Planck dataset, gives H 0 = 67.49 ± 0.53 km s −1 Mpc −1 at 68% CL [28].…”
Section: Earlymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It emerges from the comparison between early-time and late-time measurements of the Hubble constant. From one side, CMB analysis [5,66,[105][106][107][108], BAO surveys [6,101,109,110] with standard BBN constraints [111] and combinations of CMB, BAO, SNIa [112], RSD and cosmic shear data [78,113,114] point towards lower values of H 0 (H 0 = 67.4 ± 0.5 km s −1 Mpc −1 from Planck 2018 [5]). On the other side, the local measurements based on standard candles prefer higher values for the Hubble constant [115] (H 0 = 73.04 ± 1.04 km s −1 Mpc −1 from SH0ES 2022 [17]).…”
Section: Hubble Tension In Light Of the Non-local Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%