Biotechnology for Medicinal Plants 2012
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-29974-2_9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Implications of Cellular Heterogeneity on Plant Cell Culture Performance

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

1
1
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 194 publications
1
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These differences in gas composition and inoculum used for the bioreactor cultures explained difference performance, though the same PGR regimen was used for both bioreactor cultures. Any cell culture made will be unique due to its physiological state, record of subculture, and inherent heterogeneity (somoclonal variation, aggregates sizes, among others) (Bhatia & Sharma, 2015;Deus-Neumann & Zenk, 1984;Patil & Roberts, 2013). The findings reported here are in line with this.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 87%
“…These differences in gas composition and inoculum used for the bioreactor cultures explained difference performance, though the same PGR regimen was used for both bioreactor cultures. Any cell culture made will be unique due to its physiological state, record of subculture, and inherent heterogeneity (somoclonal variation, aggregates sizes, among others) (Bhatia & Sharma, 2015;Deus-Neumann & Zenk, 1984;Patil & Roberts, 2013). The findings reported here are in line with this.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 87%
“…Cells in the interior of aggregates are subject to a different microenvironment compared with free floating cells or cells on the surface of aggregates (Street, 1973), including differences in oxygen (Hulst et al , 1989) and nutrient availability (Patil and Roberts, 2013). Other factors that may contribute to the difference in S-phase duration include genetic and epigenetic instability, such as chromosome rearrangements, DNA methylation, and somatic mutation (reviewed by Lee and Phillips, 1988; Phillips et al , 1994; Tanurdzic et al , 2008).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%