2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.tra.2005.02.016
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Implications of congestion charging for departure time choice: Work and non-work schedule flexibility

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
36
0
1

Year Published

2010
2010
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 57 publications
(38 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
1
36
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The relaxation of work hour constraints, coupled with time of day pricing is bound to have a dramatic effect on the hourly distribution of traffic. This conclusion is supported by previous research that highlighted the importance of the constraints imposed by employers on the employees' time of travel choices (Saleh and Farrell 2005). It should not come as a surprise that rescheduling of trips to off-peak hours accounted for only 0.69% of the sample.…”
Section: Policy Implicationssupporting
confidence: 80%
“…The relaxation of work hour constraints, coupled with time of day pricing is bound to have a dramatic effect on the hourly distribution of traffic. This conclusion is supported by previous research that highlighted the importance of the constraints imposed by employers on the employees' time of travel choices (Saleh and Farrell 2005). It should not come as a surprise that rescheduling of trips to off-peak hours accounted for only 0.69% of the sample.…”
Section: Policy Implicationssupporting
confidence: 80%
“…A number of researchers have noted that it might be a good approach to focus on the relationship between work time flexibility and traffic management (Brewer, 1998;Saleh & Farrell, 2005;D'Ariano et al, 2008). Therefore, we need to determine whether commuters are using flexible time schedules and what role it plays in the choice of time shift due to incentives.…”
Section: About Herementioning
confidence: 99%
“…[3,27,32,39,[42][43][44][45][46][47]), New Zealand [27], Portugal [49], United Kingdom (e.g. [15,[18][19][20][21][22]30]). Among the developing countries, an SP survey to investigate acceptability and behavioural responses (e.g.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%