2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.isci.2020.101223
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Implications of Error-Prone Long-Read Whole-Genome Shotgun Sequencing on Characterizing Reference Microbiomes

Abstract: Long-read sequencing techniques, such as the Oxford Nanopore Technology, can generate reads that are tens of kilobases in length and are therefore particularly relevant for microbiome studies. However, owing to the higher per-base error rates than typical short-read sequencing, the application of long-read sequencing on microbiomes remains largely unexplored. Here we deeply sequenced two human microbiota mock community samples (HM-276D and HM-277D) from the Human Microbiome Project. We showed that assembly pro… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…S4) 33,46 . RedBean displayed a reduced performance in comparison to other longread assemblers 32,33,46,47 . To the best of our knowledge, no other metagenome assembly benchmark has included Pomoxis, Shasta, or Raven.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 82%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…S4) 33,46 . RedBean displayed a reduced performance in comparison to other longread assemblers 32,33,46,47 . To the best of our knowledge, no other metagenome assembly benchmark has included Pomoxis, Shasta, or Raven.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 82%
“…Our results are in accordance with previous studies. MetaFlye has proved to outperform other tools in terms of metagenome recovery when using different mock communities 32,33 , although it must be noted that these previous studies did not include all the tools selected in the present benchmark. Canu also performed well in other studies 33 , and has been proposed for increasing the contiguity of metagenome assembled genomes recovered from real samples 46 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…However substantial limitations of this approach have become evident, including problems related to the use of multi-sample co-assemblies 19 , 66 , 67 , the challenges of resolving genomes to strain level 68 , difficulties related to extracting MAGs from communities of high ecological complexity 69 , 70 and the limitations of automated binning procedures, requiring careful evaluation of recovered genomes 71 . In response to these challenges, recent efforts have combined short read with emerging complementary techniques such as HiC metagenomics 72 74 , synthetic long reads 75 , 76 , or long read sequencing 12 , 16 23 and collectively these results suggest substantial improvements can be made in the quality and completeness of metagenome-assembled genomes using multiple types of sequence data.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…New long read analysis methods 13 , 14 and binning algorithms designed for long read metagenome data 15 have also appeared, anticipating the future expansion of metagenome data generated from these new instruments. More recent studies 12 , 16 23 have collectively established that full length (or near-full length genomes) can be recovered from long read sequencing of complex communities, which sets the stage for further development of genome-resolved long read metagenomics.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite the advantages over short-read sequencing data, complete contiguous assemblies are still constrained by the relatively high error rate of nanopore reads, and the quality of the metagenome assembly is related to the coverage of the different species present in the sample, which in turn depends on the experiment throughput. In practice, the read-length advantage of nanopore enables nearly complete assemblies even for low abundance strains, provided that they are covered at a minimal level [89] .…”
Section: Metagenomicsmentioning
confidence: 99%