Phonological Explorations 2012
DOI: 10.1515/9783110295177.265
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Implications of Harmonic Serialism for lexical tone association

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
14
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
2
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…8 This paper further follows previous work in assuming that a tone shift operation is not part of Gen (McCarthy et al 2012: 267ff, but 8 A major conclusion made by McCarthy et al (2012) is that in HS, tone cannot be lexically linked in any language. This is at odds with the present approach, where lexical linking is assumed.…”
Section: Harmonic Serialismsupporting
confidence: 67%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…8 This paper further follows previous work in assuming that a tone shift operation is not part of Gen (McCarthy et al 2012: 267ff, but 8 A major conclusion made by McCarthy et al (2012) is that in HS, tone cannot be lexically linked in any language. This is at odds with the present approach, where lexical linking is assumed.…”
Section: Harmonic Serialismsupporting
confidence: 67%
“…The present operation set closely follows previous work on this topic. See Pruitt (2010; for an in-depth treatment of implementing metrical structure and stress in HS, and see McCarthy et al (2012) for previous work on tone.…”
Section: Harmonic Serialismmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Shift in HS can be derived in multiple steps. The two most common situations are: (i) spreading and subsequent delinking from the donor segment, and (ii) delinking of the associated feature and subsequent linking to a different segment (McCarthy 2006;McCarthy, Mullin & Smith 2012b). In this paper, however, we argue that shifting must also be a single Gen operation, which we call Flop (Alderete 1999).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 83%
“…The faithfulness constraints are likewise meant to stand in for a nuanced account of place faithfulness. For discussion of how directionality and place‐faithfulness is best captured in OT, and for improved accounts which go beyond the scope of this article, see Becker and Tessier (2011) and references therein, but also McCarthy, .) Note that since Agree‐Right is a markedness constraint, the learners ranking biases will at first place it at the top of the hierarchy, resulting the regression shown here:…”
Section: Type 2: Regressions That Emerge From Child‐specific Processesmentioning
confidence: 99%