2020
DOI: 10.1080/07329113.2020.1796297
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Implications of legal pluralism for socio-technical transition studies – scrutinizing the ascendancy of the ring seine fishery in India

Abstract: This paper considers the contribution of legal pluralism scholarship to the field of socio-technical transition studies. Making use of a case study on the changeover to ring seine fishing in India, it pays particular attention to the implications of legal pluralismor the co-existence of multiple legal systems in a societal fieldfor the stability of such transitions. Ring seine fishing developed in particular niches in the 1970s to spread swiftly throughout the subcontinent, dividing the fisher population into … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 34 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Furthermore, the secretary of the irrigation scheme seems to counterpose introduced bylaws with pre-existing socially embedded arrangements, yet empirical studies suggest that irrigation management is often shaped by the piecing together of introduced rules and culturally acceptable social norms, beliefs and practices (Bavinck, 2020;Cleaver, 2012;de Koning, 2011). We refer to this process as institutional bricolage 3 , in which a blending of different elements creates (un)intentionally hybrid institutionsand enactments in practiceoften serving multiple purposes (Cleaver, 2001(Cleaver, , 2002Cleaver and De Koning, 2015;Jones, 2015;Karambiri et al, 2020).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, the secretary of the irrigation scheme seems to counterpose introduced bylaws with pre-existing socially embedded arrangements, yet empirical studies suggest that irrigation management is often shaped by the piecing together of introduced rules and culturally acceptable social norms, beliefs and practices (Bavinck, 2020;Cleaver, 2012;de Koning, 2011). We refer to this process as institutional bricolage 3 , in which a blending of different elements creates (un)intentionally hybrid institutionsand enactments in practiceoften serving multiple purposes (Cleaver, 2001(Cleaver, , 2002Cleaver and De Koning, 2015;Jones, 2015;Karambiri et al, 2020).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%