2013
DOI: 10.1002/prop.201200139
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Implications of minimum‐length deformed quantum mechanics for QFT/QG

Abstract: After picking out what may seem more realistic minimal gravitational deformation of quantum mechanics, we study its back reaction on gravity. The large distance behaviour of Newtonian potential coincides with the result obtained by using of effective field theory approach to general relativity (the correction proves to be of repulsive nature). The short distance corrections result in Planck mass black hole remnants with zero temperature. The deformation of position-momentum uncertainty relations leads to the s… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 61 publications
0
12
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Simple physical picture behind this consideration allows one to guess higher-dimensional generalization of minimum-length deformed quantum mechanics (QM). The deformed QM derived this way disagrees with the result that follows from the well known arguments [4][5][6] (and some other closely related arguments [7]) for estimating the gravitational corrections to the uncertainty relation. The rest of the paper is devoted to the * Electronic address: maziashvili@iliauni.edu.ge discussion of quantum field theory (QFT) in view of the deformed quantization both at first and second quantization levels.…”
Section: A Introductioncontrasting
confidence: 65%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Simple physical picture behind this consideration allows one to guess higher-dimensional generalization of minimum-length deformed quantum mechanics (QM). The deformed QM derived this way disagrees with the result that follows from the well known arguments [4][5][6] (and some other closely related arguments [7]) for estimating the gravitational corrections to the uncertainty relation. The rest of the paper is devoted to the * Electronic address: maziashvili@iliauni.edu.ge discussion of quantum field theory (QFT) in view of the deformed quantization both at first and second quantization levels.…”
Section: A Introductioncontrasting
confidence: 65%
“…In the case δP ≪ G −1/(2+n) N the correction term in Eq. (16) can be considered as a result of the gravitational extension of the wave-packet localization width as compared to the Minkowskian background [7]. Yet, the correction term in Eq.…”
Section: Comparing With the Results Following Frommentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Any phenomenological modifications to the standard UP, motivated by such heuristic considerations as the disturbance to the quantum mechanical system caused by the gravitational field of the probing particle, must be checked for mathematical consistency. This may be possible using theories of deformed quantum mechanics, in which the deformation parameter is explicitly linked to a change in the background metric [12,16,17]. However, it remains unclear whether any GUP-type phenomenology which leads to a unified expression for the Compton and Schwarzschild scales can account for their different physical natures.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[12]). Such a theory can be consistently formulated in terms of a vector space [13,14,15] and may incorporate quantum gravity effects if the GUP deformations are directly related to deformations of the metric [16,17]. However, this is not the approach adopted here.…”
Section: Between Measurements the Development Of The Wave Function Wmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, the corresponding ( + 1)-dimensional deformed commutation relations are not Lorentz invariant and give rise to some version of the deformed special relativity. The field theories built on such commutation relations hence do not respect Lorentz symmetry [15,[18][19][20]. Although Lorentz invariance is not required for the generalization, there are some attempts to introduce ( +1)-dimensional deformed Lorentz invariant generalizations of -dimensional deformed commutation relations [21,22].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%