1988
DOI: 10.1007/bf00043376
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Implications of selecting for persistency on hydroponics in timothy (Phleum pratense L.)

Abstract: Twenty four populations of timothy (Phleum pratense L.) with varying persistency were grown on a nutrient flow system and in soil . Growth analyses showed that seedlings grew faster on nutrient solution than in soil but this was only temporary. After the fourth cutting, regrowth of plants in soil was faster than on hydroponics, probably because the optimal growth conditions and the relatively high temperatures in the nutrient solution led to a depleted storage carbohydrate pool, necessary for regrowth .Non-des… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

1990
1990
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the modified version, the potential RUE is for aboveground biomass including the stubble, while in the initial version the potential RUE was based solely on harvestable biomass. Understandably, the potential RUE is higher if the root biomass is included (Schapendonk and de Vos, 1988). The potential RUE for harvestable biomass was greater than the measured seasonal values and ranged from 2.0 to 2.7 g DM MJ −1 PAR under nonlimiting N and water conditions (Bélanger and Richards, 1995, 1997).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the modified version, the potential RUE is for aboveground biomass including the stubble, while in the initial version the potential RUE was based solely on harvestable biomass. Understandably, the potential RUE is higher if the root biomass is included (Schapendonk and de Vos, 1988). The potential RUE for harvestable biomass was greater than the measured seasonal values and ranged from 2.0 to 2.7 g DM MJ −1 PAR under nonlimiting N and water conditions (Bélanger and Richards, 1995, 1997).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…refer to parameter names as used in the model. a (Kornher, 1971), b (Evans, 1989; Hikosaka & Terashima, 1995), c (Belanger & Richards, 1995), d (Schapendonk & de Vos, 1988), e (Halling, 1988), f (Solhaug, 1991), g (Heide et al. , 1985), h (Belanger, 1998), i (Langer, 1954), j (Höglind, unpublished), k (Peacock, 1976), l (Heide, 1982).…”
Section: Literature Review On Timothymentioning
confidence: 99%