2017
DOI: 10.1111/anae.13736
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Implications of the 2015 AAGBI recommendations for standards of monitoring during anaesthesia and recovery

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
4
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
5
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Currently, healthcare providers frequently monitor internal pressure of standard TT cuffs, as recommended by various clinical practice guidelines . In our current study, we found that the novel cuff had very low compliance, which is common in cuffs made of silicone , but the main drawback is that the internal pressure does not reflect the pressure transmitted against the tracheal wall and even slight increases in inflation volumes could double the transmitted tracheal pressure (Figs.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 63%
“…Currently, healthcare providers frequently monitor internal pressure of standard TT cuffs, as recommended by various clinical practice guidelines . In our current study, we found that the novel cuff had very low compliance, which is common in cuffs made of silicone , but the main drawback is that the internal pressure does not reflect the pressure transmitted against the tracheal wall and even slight increases in inflation volumes could double the transmitted tracheal pressure (Figs.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 63%
“…A set of recommendations published by a world respected authority in anesthesia states that the use of neuromuscular monitoring, along with other standards, will lead to a reduction in adverse events and improve patient safety. Furthermore, they clarify that the use of neuromuscular monitoring in our profession is still too low, and remind us that clinical assessment alone of the offset of neuromuscular paralytic drugs is inadequate [1]. We believe perioperative neuromuscular monitoring to be mandatory for those patients who receive neuromuscular paralytic drugs.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Errando et al [19] reported that 26.7% of patients had PORC after the use of a non-depolarising neuro-muscular blocker. The fifth edition of the Association of Anesthetists of Great Britain and Ireland standards of monitoring was indicated that monitoring of neuromuscular blocking agents was mandatory [20] . Arbous et al [21] observed a significant decrease in PORC when monitoring muscle relaxation in the operating room and using reversal agents.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%